Protocol--the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation.
Protocol--the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008567
复制
发表时间：
2015-08-03
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Pawson R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Greenhalgh T;Wong G;Jagosh J;Greenhalgh J;Manzano A;Westhorp G;Pawson R
现实主义评价是卫生服务研究中日益流行的方法论。就现实主义评价而言，该项目旨在：制定质量和报告标准及培训材料;建设开展和批判性评价这些标准的能力;为非专业参与者和寻求参与者编制资源和培训材料。为了实现我们的目标，我们将：（1）建立管理和治理基础设施;（2）招募一个由35名具有不同的可再生能源相关经验的参与者组成的跨学科德尔菲小组;（3）总结当前关于可再生能源最佳实践的文献和专家意见;（4）运行一个在线德尔菲小组，以生成和改进质量和报告标准的项目;（5）获取"真实的世界"的经验和可再生能源的挑战-例如，为现实主义评估提供持续的支持，主办RAMESES JISC关于现实主义研究的邮件列表，并将这些问题和见解提供给德尔菲小组的审议;（7）整理研究人员、学生、评审人员和非专业人员在可再生能源方面的学习和培训需求的实例;（8）编写、提供和评估可再生能源培训材料，并举办培训讲习班;和（9）为RE患者和其他非专业参与者开发和评估信息和资源（例如，起草信息表模板和同意书模板）;（10）传播培训材料和其他资源。计划产出：（1）可再生能源的质量和报告标准及培训材料。(2)为可再生能源提供方法支持。(3)提高支持和评价可再生能源的能力。(4)为参与RE的患者和公众提供简明易懂的英语资源。现实主义评价是一种较新的评价方法，其在评价中的总体地位尚未完全确立。与所有主要研究方法一样，关于质量保证和统一报告的指导是提高质量和一致性的重要一步。
Realist evaluation is an increasingly popular methodology in health services research. For realist evaluations (RE) this project aims to: develop quality and reporting standards and training materials; build capacity for undertaking and critically evaluating them; produce resources and training materials for lay participants, and those seeking to involve them. To achieve our aims, we will: (1) Establish management and governance infrastructure; (2) Recruit an interdisciplinary Delphi panel of 35 participants with diverse relevant experience of RE; (3) Summarise current literature and expert opinion on best practice in RE; (4) Run an online Delphi panel to generate and refine items for quality and reporting standards; (5) Capture ‘real world’ experiences and challenges of RE—for example, by providing ongoing support to realist evaluations, hosting the RAMESES JISCmail list on realist research, and feeding problems and insights from these into the deliberations of the Delphi panel; (6) Produce quality and reporting standards; (7) Collate examples of the learning and training needs of researchers, students, reviewers and lay members in relation to RE; (8) Develop, deliver and evaluate training materials for RE and deliver training workshops; and (9) Develop and evaluate information and resources for patients and other lay participants in RE (eg, draft template information sheets and model consent forms) and; (10) Disseminate training materials and other resources. Planned outputs: (1) Quality and reporting standards and training materials for RE. (2) Methodological support for RE. (3) Increase in capacity to support and evaluate RE. (4) Accessible, plain-English resources for patients and the public participating in RE. The realist evaluation is a relatively new approach to evaluation and its overall place in the is not yet fully established. As with all primary research approaches, guidance on quality assurance and uniform reporting is an important step towards improving quality and consistency.