Relations between implicit measures of prejudice: What are we measuring?
Relations between implicit measures of prejudice: What are we measuring?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1477.x
复制
发表时间：
2003-11-01
影响因子：
8.2
通讯作者：
Fazio, RH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Olson, MA;Fazio, RH
最近的一些研究结果表明，不同的偏见内隐测量方法可以评估相同的潜在结构，但其他研究表明，它们可能不会。在这个实验中，白人参与者完成了种族态度启动测量的一个版本，这个版本要么鼓励根据种族对面部启动进行分类，要么不鼓励这样的分类，然后完成内隐联想测试。只有在启动测量中要求按种族分类时，才发现两个测量之间存在对应关系。此外，当参与者被引导以种族来解释个体时，他们比不被鼓励时表现出更大的偏见。讨论的重点是对一个类别的评价和对该类别成员的评价之间可能存在的分离。
Some recent findings suggest that different implicit measures of prejudice assess the same underlying construct, but other work suggests that they may not. In this experiment, White participants completed a version of a priming measure of racial attitudes that either encouraged categorization of the face primes in terms of race or did not encourage such categorization, and then completed the Implicit Association Test. Correspondence between the two measures was found only when categorization by race was required on the priming measure. Moreover participants appeared more prejudiced when they were led to construe individuals in terms of race than when they were not so encouraged. The discussion focuses on the potential for dissociations between evaluations of a category and evaluations of members of the category.