A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)
A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)
复制标题
健康问卷 (WBQ) 和糖尿病治疗满意度问卷 (DTSQ) 的标准版本和计算机化版本的比较
作者：
F. Pouwer;F. Snoek;H. Ploeg;R. Heine;Arie Brand
本研究采用随机交叉设计，对两种自填问卷的纸笔评价与计算机评价的等效性进行了研究。因此，105例门诊糖尿病患者被邀请参加; 76例患者以随机顺序完成计算机和纸笔版本的幸福感问卷（WBQ）和糖尿病治疗满意度问卷（DTSQ），平均间隔7天。量表显示出较高的重测相关性和平均值，离散度，峰度和偏度被认为是大致相同的两个版本。在这两种模式的评估，抑郁和能源规模被证明是敏感的结转效应，导致更好的幸福分数在第二次测量。几乎所有的受试者都报告说，使用个人电脑在实现一个问卷是很容易的。得出的结论是，纸笔和WBQ和DTSQ的计算机化版本可以被认为是等同的。因此，从纸笔评估中获得的标准和截止分数可用于WBQ和DTSQ的计算机化版本，反之亦然。
In the present study, the equivalence of paper and pencil assessment versus computer assessment of two self-administered questionnaires was investigated by means of a randomized cross-over design. Therefore, 105 out-patients with diabetes were invited to participate; 76 patients completed both the computer and the paper and pencil version of the Well-being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) in a randomized order, with a mean interval of 7 days. The scales showed high test-retest correlations and the means, dispersions, kurtosis and skewness were found to be approximately the same in both versions. In both modes of assessment, the depression and the energy scale proved to be sensitive for carry-over effects, resulting in better well-being scores at the second measurement. Almost all subjects reported that using the personal computer in the realization of a questionnaire was easy. It is concluded that the paper and pencil and the computerized versions of the WBQ and DTSQ can be considered equivalent. Therefore, the norms and cut-off scores obtained from paper and pencil assessments can be used in computerized versions of the WBQ and DTSQ and vice versa.