Cross-translation of the job descriptive index: Validity and reliability procedure for the translation.
Cross-translation of the job descriptive index: Validity and reliability procedure for the translation.
复制标题
职位描述索引的交叉翻译：翻译的有效性和可靠性程序。
DOI：
10.3233/wor-1996-7102
复制
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
B. Diefenbach
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Nasser;B. Diefenbach
本研究概述了态度工具的翻译程序。该研究调查了“工作类型”的工作描述指数子量表的交叉翻译。交叉翻译或委员会翻译程序要求两名或两名以上翻译人员将文本从源语言翻译为目标语言，然后由专家评估这些翻译的有效性。根据经验，这种方法需要三位翻译人员，将文书从英语翻译成阿拉伯语，然后由专家评估三位翻译人员的翻译。该方法由 180 名双语者尝试源语言，然后尝试目标语言工具或翻译工具来支持。然后通过方差分析、相关分析和因子分析对两个版本进行比较。结果表明阿拉伯语和英语版本的可靠性很高。委员会翻译方法提供了一种有效的翻译方法，但结果表明，两种语言的文书并未显示出项目之间的相似性或等同性。
This study outlines a translation procedure for an attitudinal instrument. The study investigated the cross-translation of the Job Descriptive Index Sub scale of 'type of work.' The cross-translation or committee translation procedure asks two or more translators to translate a text from source to target language, then an expert assesses the validity of these translations. Empirically, this method has three translators, translate the instrument from English to Arabic and then an expert assesses the translations made by the three translators. This method was supported by having 180 bilinguals attempt the source language and later attempt the target language instrument or the translated instrument. The two versions are then compared through the ANOVA, correlational analyses and factor analyses. The results indicated a high reliability for the Arabic and English versions. The committee translation approach provides a valid method for translation, the results however, showed that the instrument in both languages did not show item to item similarity or equivalence.