Argument disrupts interpersonal synchrony
Argument disrupts interpersonal synchrony
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/17470218.2013.853089
复制
发表时间：
2013-11-01
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Dale, Rick
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Paxton, Alexandra;Dale, Rick
对人际融合和同步性的研究表明，随着时间的推移，相互作用的个体会产生更相似的情感、行为和认知。尽管在许多情况下探讨了它的动态，但冲突期间的趋同几乎完全被忽视了。我们提出了一项简单但在生态学上有效的研究，比较了不同的情景背景如何影响身体运动的人际融合，以及情绪状态在多大程度上影响这两种对话环境中的融合。使用线性混合效应模型，我们发现在争论过程中，同相身体同步性显著降低。然而，情感变化并不能显著预测人际同步性水平的变化，这表明从属关系和争论之间的情感效价差异不能完全解释我们的结果。
Research on interpersonal convergence and synchrony characterizes the way in which interacting individuals come to have more similar affect, behaviour, and cognition over time. Although its dynamics have been explored in many settings, convergence during conflict has been almost entirely overlooked. We present a simple but ecologically valid study comparing how different situational contexts that highlight affiliation and argument impact interpersonal convergence of body movement and to what degree emotional states affect convergence in both conversational settings. Using linear mixed-effect models, we found that in-phase bodily synchrony decreases significantly during argument. However, affective changes did not significantly predict changes in levels of interpersonal synchrony, suggesting that differences in affect valences between affiliation and argument cannot solely explain our results.