Do measures of depressive symptoms function differently in people with spinal cord injury versus primary care patients: the CES-D, PHQ-9, and PROMISA®-D
Do measures of depressive symptoms function differently in people with spinal cord injury versus primary care patients: the CES-D, PHQ-9, and PROMISA®-D
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11136-016-1363-x
复制
发表时间：
2017-01-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Amtmann, Dagmar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cook, Karon F.;Kallen, Michael A.;Amtmann, Dagmar
本研究回顾分析了患者健康问卷抑郁量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表和美国国立卫生研究院患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMISA(R))1.0版8项抑郁简写形式(PROIS-D)的反应。采用有序Logistic回归方法评价差异项目函数(DIF)的存在。根据标准标准，三个目标测量中的任何项目均未被标记为DIF。在后续的敏感性分析中，改变了标准，使分析对潜在的DIF更敏感。根据这一标准对标记为DIF的分数进行了校正。研究中评估的三种抑郁筛查方法在SCI患者样本中的表现与普通样本和社区样本没有差别。当对SCI患者进行治疗时，跨诊断症状似乎并不会错误地夸大抑郁严重程度的估计。
To evaluate whether items of three measures of depressive symptoms function differently in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) than in persons from a primary care sample.This study was a retrospective analysis of responses to the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale, and the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMISA (R)) version 1.0 eight-item depression short form 8b (PROMIS-D). The presence of differential item function (DIF) was evaluated using ordinal logistic regression.No items of any of the three target measures were flagged for DIF based on standard criteria. In a follow-up sensitivity analyses, the criterion was changed to make the analysis more sensitive to potential DIF. Scores were corrected for DIF flagged under this criterion. Minimal differences were found between the original scores and those corrected for DIF under the sensitivity criterion.The three depression screening measures evaluated in this study did not perform differently in samples of individuals with SCI compared to general and community samples. Transdiagnostic symptoms did not appear to spuriously inflate depression severity estimates when administered to people with SCI.