Whose violence, whose security? Can violence reduction and security work for poor, excluded and vulnerable people?
Whose violence, whose security? Can violence reduction and security work for poor, excluded and vulnerable people?
复制标题
谁的暴力，谁的安全？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Luckham
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Luckham
摘要本文探讨了联合国和世界银行减少暴力议程的基本假设：所有形式的暴力都是相称的，完全符合因果模型;暴力是“逆向发展”，与国家脆弱性密不可分;安全是一种不言而喻的公共产品。它提出了一个框架，对全球、国家和非国家或地方暴力行为以及它们之间的相互作用进行分类。报告建议，对安全和减少暴力的任何评价的出发点都应该是穷人、受排斥者和弱势群体，包括那些生活在叛乱边缘的人的本地理解和日常经历。
Abstract This paper probes behind the assumptions underpinning the violence reduction agendas of the UN and the World Bank: that all forms of violence are commensurate and fit neatly into causal models; that violence is ‘development in reverse’ and inseparable from state fragility; and that security is a self-evident public good. It presents a framework to classify global, state and non-state or local violences and the interactions amongst them. It suggests that the starting point for any evaluation of security as well as violence reduction should be the vernacular understandings and day-to-day experience of poor, excluded and vulnerable people, including those living at insurgent margins.