Transient visual disturbance after photodynamic therapy.
Transient visual disturbance after photodynamic therapy.
复制标题
光动力治疗后短暂的视力障碍。
DOI:
10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.072
复制
发表时间:
2005
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
C. Meyer
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Mennel;C. Meyer
LAI AND ASSOCIATES 1 EVALUATED PATIENTS WITH VARI-ous macular disease prior to as well as 4 days, 2 weeks, and 1 month after photodynamic therapy (PDT) by multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Although the authors determined a statistically significant reduced retinal function by a lower N1 and P1 amplitude at the 4-day and 2-week follow-up visit, the values at 1 month after PDT did not differ from the preoperative values. The authors concluded that PDT might cause an early, transient impaired retinal function, although visual acuity (VA) values at the 4-day and 2-week follow-up visit remained missing in the article. We appreciate the authors’ findings and observed that several of our patients also complained about a transient reduced VA during the first week after PDT. In a prospective study, we evaluated 24 patients (53 PDT sessions) before PDT as well as 2 days and 1 week after PDT by A-scan ultrasound biometry and optical coherence tomography (OCT). 2 VA was tested with the preoperative refraction as well as the best-corrected postoperative refraction at each follow-up visit. Two days after PDT, VA declined by a mean of 1.3 lines using the former preoperative refraction. However, the decline diminished to 0.26 lines if a new best-corrected refraction was made. Although the postoperative average refractive shift was+ 0.35 diopters, the mean corneoretinal distance was reduced by 0.13 mm, corresponding to a consecutive increased retinal thickness up to 680 μm on OCT. The cross-sectional OCT-scan in the macular area revealed a retinal detachment, whereas the anatomy of the neurosensory retina maintained intact, demonstrating no relevant thickening or schisis-like changes. One week after PDT, the average VA did not differ from the preoperative values using the initial preoperative refraction; however, an increase of 0.23 lines was achieved using a new evaluated best-corrected refraction. The average hyperopic shift at this time was+ 0.07 diopters. On OCT, the retinal thickness decreased to 315 μm. Our results demonstrated subjective transient visual disturbances during the first postoperative week, which could be compensated by using adequate refraction. Previous examinations by Costa and associates determined that a few hours after PDT an increased subretinal leakage on indocyanine green angiography (ICG) and consecutive retinal elevation on OCT, confirming our functional and OCT findings. 3 Michels and Schmidt-Erfurth observed an increased leakage 1 day after PDT in fluorescein angiography (FA) and ICG, followed by a marked choroidal hypoperfusion on ICG 1 week after PDT. They concluded that an early breakdown at the blood-retina-barrier may be followed by hypoxia. 4 These effects may reflect OCT findings by Rogers and associates, who reported structural alterations in terms of persistent retinal thinning 3 months after PDT. 5 Corresponding functional alterations may explain a reported change from positive images (black letters on white background) to inverted negative images. Meyer and associates observed a permanent shift from positive to negative images 1 week after PDT, which remained and did not change even after repeated treatment sessions. 6 The reported transient reduced retinal function using mfERG by Lai and associates may reflect an anatomical accumulation of subretinal fluid as described by Mennel and associates and Costa and associates using OCT. 2, 3 Whereas subretinal fluid is mainly reabsorbed after 1 week, reduced N1 and P1 values 2 weeks after PDT may possibly reflect a recovery process of the photoreceptors or choroidal hypoperfusion. 4 Although Lai and associates 1 …