Interaction between maltose-binding protein and the membrane-associated maltose transporter complex in Escherichia coli.
Interaction between maltose-binding protein and the membrane-associated maltose transporter complex in Escherichia coli.
复制标题
大肠杆菌中麦芽糖结合蛋白与膜相关麦芽糖转运蛋白复合物之间的相互作用。
DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01376.x
复制
发表时间:
1992
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Nikaido,H
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dean,DA;Hor,LI;Shuman,HA;Nikaido,H
Active transport of maltose inEscherichia colirequires the presence of both maltose‐binding protein (MBP) in the periplasm and a complex of MalF, MalG, and MalK proteins (FGK2) located in the cytoplasmic membrane. Earlier, mutants inmalForMalGwere isolated that are able to grow on maltose in the complete absence of MBP. When the wild‐typemalE+allele, coding for MBP, was introduced into these MBP‐independent mutants, they frequently lost their ability to grow on maltose. Furthermore, starting from these Mal‐strains, Mal+secondary mutants that contained suppressor mutations inmalEwere isolated. In this study, we examined the interaction of wild‐type and mutant MBPs with wild‐type and mutant FGK2 complexes by using right‐side‐out membrane vesicles. The vesicles from a MBP‐independent mutant (malG511) transported maltose in the absence of MBP, withKmandVmaxvalues similar to those found in intact cells. However, addition of wild‐type MBP to these mutant vesicles produced unexpected responses. Althoughmale+malG511cells could not utilize maltose, wild‐type MBP at low concentrations stimulated the maltose uptake bymalG511vesicles. At higher concentrations of the wild‐type MBP and maltose, however, maltose transport intomalG511vesicles became severely inhibited. This behaviour of the vesicles was also reflected in the phenotype ofmale+malG511cells, which were found to be capable of transporting maltose from a low external concentration (1μM), but apparently not from millimolar concentrations present in maltose minimal medium. We found that the mutant FGK2complex, containing MalG511, had a much higher apparent affinity towards the wild‐type MBP than did the wild‐type FGK2complex. We propose that the wild‐type FGK2complex exists in at least two conformations, active and inactive, and that the binding of the liganded MBP converts the latter into the former. The mutant complex presumably exists predominantly in the active form that has a higher affinity toward liganded MBP, and the Inhibition of the mutant complex by an excess of maltose and wild‐type MBP may be explained as a form of inhibition by excess substrate.