[The Significance of Terminology for the Idea of a Historical Period--Considerations on Frühe Neuzeit/Early Modern].
[The Significance of Terminology for the Idea of a Historical Period--Considerations on Frühe Neuzeit/Early Modern].
复制标题
【术语对于历史时期观念的意义——对Frühe Neuzeit/早期现代的思考】
DOI：
10.1002/bewi.201501719
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
Justus Nipperdey
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Justus Nipperdey
术语对历史时期概念的意义--关于弗吕赫新/早期现代的思考本文着重探讨历史时期的命名与该时期归属实质之间的关系。它认为，实质性意义上的中立化的可能性取决于用来描绘历史时期的术语。本文以“早期近代史”为例，概述了该术语在二十世纪史学中的用法。虽然这个概念显然无法逃脱继承前现代时代的现代性的内在目的论，但分析表明，历史学家以令人惊讶的不同方式使用了早期现代，试图克服这个术语本身的语义含义。
The Significance of Terminology for the Idea of a Historical Period - Considerations on Frühe Neuzeit/Early Modern. This article focuses on the relationship between the names given to historical periods and the attributed substance of that period. It argues that the possibility of a neutralisation in terms of substantive meaning depends on the terminology used to delineate a historical period. Considering the example of 'early modern history' the article sketches the usage of that term in twentieth century historiography. While it is clear that the concept cannot escape the inherent teleology of modernity succeeding pre-modern ages, the analysis shows that historians have used 'early modern' in surprisingly divers ways trying to overcome the semantic meaning of the term itself.