Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP.
Comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine boosting in England: matched cohort study in OpenSAFELY-TPP.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/bmj-2022-072808
复制
发表时间:
2023-03-15
影响因子:
105.7
通讯作者:
Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hulme, William J.;Horne, Elsie M. F.;Parker, Edward P. K.;Keogh, Ruth H.;Williamson, Elizabeth J.;Walker, Venexia;Palmer, Tom M.;Curtis, Helen J.;Walker, Alex J.;Andrews, Colm D.;Mehrkar, Amir;Morley, Jessica;MacKenna, Brian;Bacon, Sebastian C. J.;Goldacre, Ben;Hernan, Miguel A.;Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) covid-19 vaccines during the booster programme in England. Matched cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial. Linked primary care, hospital, and covid-19 surveillance records available within the OpenSAFELY-TPP research platform, covering a period when the SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variants were dominant. 3 237 918 adults who received a booster dose of either vaccine between 29 October 2021 and 25 February 2022 as part of the national booster programme in England and who received a primary course of BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1. Vaccination with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 as a booster vaccine dose. Recorded SARS-CoV-2 positive test, covid-19 related hospital admission, covid-19 related death, and non-covid-19 related death at 20 weeks after receipt of the booster dose. 1 618 959 people were matched in each vaccine group, contributing a total 64 546 391 person weeks of follow-up. The 20 week risks per 1000 for a positive SARS-CoV-2 test were 164.2 (95% confidence interval 163.3 to 165.1) for BNT162b2 and 159.9 (159.0 to 160.8) for mRNA-1273; the hazard ratio comparing mRNA-1273 with BNT162b2 was 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.95 to 0.96). The 20 week risks per 1000 for hospital admission with covid-19 were 0.75 (0.71 to 0.79) for BNT162b2 and 0.65 (0.61 to 0.69) for mRNA-1273; the hazard ratio was 0.89 (0.82 to 0.95). Covid-19 related deaths were rare: the 20 week risks per 1000 were 0.028 (0.021 to 0.037) for BNT162b2 and 0.024 (0.018 to 0.033) for mRNA-1273; hazard ratio 0.83 (0.58 to 1.19). Comparative effectiveness was generally similar within subgroups defined by the primary course vaccine brand, age, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and clinical vulnerability. Relative benefit was similar when vaccines were compared separately in the delta and omicron variant eras. This matched observational study of adults estimated a modest benefit of booster vaccination with mRNA-1273 compared with BNT162b2 in preventing positive SARS-CoV-2 tests and hospital admission with covid-19 20 weeks after vaccination, during a period of delta followed by omicron variant dominance.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1097/ede.0b013e3181d61eeb
发表时间:
2010-05
期刊:
Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Lipsitch M;Tchetgen Tchetgen E;Cohen T
通讯作者:
Cohen T
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Andrews, Nick;Stowe, Julia;Kirsebom, Freja;Toffa, Samuel;Sachdeva, Ruchira;Gower, Charlotte;Ramsay, Mary;Bernal, Jamie Lopez
通讯作者:
Bernal, Jamie Lopez
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa2115463
发表时间:
2022-01-13
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Dickerman BA;Gerlovin H;Madenci AL;Kurgansky KE;Ferolito BR;Figueroa Muñiz MJ;Gagnon DR;Gaziano JM;Cho K;Casas JP;Hernán MA
通讯作者:
Hernán MA
影响因子:
39
作者:
Dickerman, Barbra A.;Madenci, Arin L.;Hernan, Miguel A.
通讯作者:
Hernan, Miguel A.
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa2116414
发表时间:
2022-03-17
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Atmar RL;Lyke KE;Deming ME;Jackson LA;Branche AR;El Sahly HM;Rostad CA;Martin JM;Johnston C;Rupp RE;Mulligan MJ;Brady RC;Frenck RW Jr;Bäcker M;Kottkamp AC;Babu TM;Rajakumar K;Edupuganti S;Dobrzynski D;Coler RN;Posavad CM;Archer JI;Crandon S;Nayak SU;Szydlo D;Zemanek JA;Dominguez Islas CP;Brown ER;Suthar MS;McElrath MJ;McDermott AB;O'Connell SE;Montefiori DC;Eaton A;Neuzil KM;Stephens DS;Roberts PC;Beigel JH;DMID 21-0012 Study Group
通讯作者:
DMID 21-0012 Study Group