Discourse markers as stance markers: Well in stance alignment in conversational interaction
Discourse markers as stance markers: Well in stance alignment in conversational interaction
复制标题
话语标记作为立场标记：对话互动中的立场对齐
DOI：
10.1075/pc.21.1.04sak
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
0.4
通讯作者：
Tomoko I. Sakita
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
飯村龍一;飯村龍一;飯村龍一;飯村龍一;飯村龍一;加藤澄;加藤澄;飯村龍一;加藤澄;加藤澄;飯村龍一;飯村龍一;加藤澄;加藤澄;加藤澄;飯村龍一;飯村龍一;加藤澄;飯村龍一;飯村龍一;飯村龍一;加藤澄;加藤澄;飯村龍一;加藤澄;加藤澄;加藤澄;飯村龍一;加藤澄;加藤澄;﨑田智子;Tomoko I. Sakita;Tomoko I. Sakita
立场是会话互动中固有的，本质上是互动的。当演讲者采取立场时，他们既要注意先前的立场和立场关系，也要注意他们的立场设定的预期后果。他们将立场关系作为处理主体间性的“社会认知关系”的一种方式来管理(Du Bois 2007)。本文运用杜波依斯提出的对话框架，论证了美国英语中的话语标记语Well是处理立场间关系的资源。由于其指称和语法的灵活性，它被独特地描述为元立场标记语，因为它不是标引特定的立场，而是协商和调节立场关系。Well从两个语境类别进行了分析：一是话语间的立场分歧，二是话题转换中的立场转换。
Stance is inherent in conversational interaction and is interactional in nature. When speakers take a stance, they pay attention to both prior stances and stance relations, as well as to the anticipated consequences of their stancetaking. They manage stance relations as a way of dealing with the “sociocognitive relations” of intersubjectivity (Du Bois 2007). Using the dialogic framework proposed by Du Bois, this paper shows that the discourse marker well in American English works as a resource for the management of relationships among stances. With its referential and grammatical flexibility, it is uniquely characterized as a meta-stance marker because, rather than indexing a specific stance, it negotiates and regulates stance relations. Well is analyzed in two contextual categories: first, at stance divergence among utterances, and second, at stance shifts embedded in topic shift.