Effects of the elimination of a state monopoly on distilled spirits' retail sales: a time-series analysis of Iowa.
Effects of the elimination of a state monopoly on distilled spirits' retail sales: a time-series analysis of Iowa.
复制标题
消除国家垄断对蒸馏酒零售额的影响：爱荷华州的时间序列分析。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1360-0443.1990.tb01651.x
复制
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Wagenaar,AC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Holder,HD;Wagenaar,AC
自美国禁酒令结束以来，只有爱荷华州取消了对非现场消费蒸馏酒销售的州零售垄断。1987年3月，所有石板零售店被关闭，私人机构被许可出售蒸馏酒。对爱荷华州的表观烈酒消费量进行了中断的时间序列分析，控制了过去二十年全国范围内的销售趋势，发现政策变化后烈酒销售量在统计上显著增加了9.5%。虽然葡萄酒销售相应下降了13.7%，啤酒销售没有变化，但烈酒零售的私有化使爱荷华州的酒精消费总量净增加。与爱荷华州接壤的各州的烈酒销售没有变化。
Since the end of prohibition in the USA, only one slate, Iowa, has eliminated its state retail monopoly of distilled spirits sales for off‐premise consumption. In March 1987 all slate retail stores were closed, and private establishments were licensed to sell distilled spirits. Interrupted time‐series analyses of apparent spirits consumption in Iowa, controlling for nationwide sales trends over the past two decades, identified a statistically significant 9.5% increase in spirits sales following the policy change. While there was a corresponding 13.7% decline in wine sales, and no change in beer sales, privatization of spirits retail sales yielded a net increase in total alcohol consumption in Iowa. No changes were found in spirits sales in states bordering Iowa.