Political Legitimacy in the Democratic View: The Case of Climate Services
Political Legitimacy in the Democratic View: The Case of Climate Services
复制标题
民主观点中的政治合法性：气候服务案例
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Greg Lusk
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Greg Lusk
温迪·S帕克和我提出了一种基于信息使用者背景价值的气候信息提供的诱导风险方法。这种方法旨在提高气候信息在社会决策中的有效性。然而，这种方法对用户价值的强调与所谓的民主观点相冲突：如果科学家使用情境价值，他们就应该使用民主认可的价值来维护政治合法性。本文借鉴协商民主理论来解决冲突，表明用户价值是否合法雇用取决于劳动力在协商时刻的分配方式。
Wendy S. Parker and I have advanced an inductive-risk approach to the provision of climate information that relies on the contextual values of information users. This approach aims to improve the effectiveness of climate information in social decision making. The approach’s emphasis on user values, however, conflicts with the so-called democratic view: if scientists employ contextual values, they ought to employ democratically endorsed values to preserve political legitimacy. This article draws on deliberative democratic theory to resolve the conflict, demonstrating that whether user values are legitimate to employ depends on the way labor is divided across deliberative moments.