Intramuscular ketamine vs. midazolam for rapid risk-reduction in suicidal, depressed emergency patients: Clinical trial design and rationale.
Intramuscular ketamine vs. midazolam for rapid risk-reduction in suicidal, depressed emergency patients: Clinical trial design and rationale.
复制标题
肌内注射氯胺酮与咪达唑仑可快速降低自杀、抑郁紧急患者的风险:临床试验设计和原理。
DOI:
10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100690
复制
发表时间:
2024
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Grunebaum,MichaelF
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sajid,Sumra;Lawrence,RyanE;Galfalvy,HangaC;Keilp,JohnG;Moitra,VivekK;Mann,JJohn;Grunebaum,MichaelF
Emergency department (ED) visits for suicidal ideation or behavior have been increasing in all age groups, particularly younger adults. A rapid-acting treatment to reduce suicidal thinking, adapted for ED use, is needed. Previous studies have shown a single dose of ketamine can improve depression and suicidal ideation within hours. However, most studies used 40 min intravenous infusions which can be impractical in a psychiatric ED. The ER-Ketamine study we describe here is a randomized midazolam-controlled clinical trial (RCT; NCT04640636) testing intramuscular (IM) ketamine's feasibility, safety, and effectiveness to rapidly reduce suicidal ideation and depression in a psychiatric ED. A pre-injection phase involves screening, informed consent, eligibility confirmation, and baseline assessment of suicidal ideation, depression, and comorbidities. The randomized double-blind IM injection is administered in the ED under research staff supervision, vital sign monitoring, pharmacokinetic blood sampling, and clinical assessments. The post-injection phase occurs on a psychiatric inpatient unit with follow-up research assessments through four weeks post-discharge. Outcome measures are feasibility, safety, and effects on suicidal ideation and depression at 24 h post-injection, and through follow-up. The target sample isN= 90 adults in a major depressive episode, assessed by ED clinicians as warranting hospitalization for suicide risk. Here we report design, rationale, and preliminary feasibility and safety for this ongoing study. Demographics of the 53 participants (ages 18 to 65 years) randomized to date suggest a diverse sample tending towards younger adults.