Hypnotic history: a reply to critics.
Hypnotic history: a reply to critics.
复制标题
催眠历史：对批评者的答复。
DOI：
10.1080/00029157.2007.10524502
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Montgomery,GuyH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kirsch,Irving;Mazzoni,Giuliana;Montgomery,GuyH
本文回应了Kirsch， Mazzoni, & Montgomery（2007）的评论。与一些评论家的看法相反，目标文章并不是为了支持催眠的特定观点。相反，它提醒了催眠研究中一个长期被接受的公理：催眠暗示的效果不能归因于催眠，除非能证明同样的暗示在催眠之外不会产生效果。
This article responds to comments on Kirsch, Mazzoni, & Montgomery (2007). Contrary to the perceptions of some commentators, the target article was not aimed at supporting a particular view of hypnosis. Instead, it was a reminder of a long accepted axiom in hypnosis research: the effects of hypnotic suggestions cannot be attributed to hypnosis unless it is demonstrated that the same suggestion does not produce the effect outside of hypnosis.