Subjective measures of climate resilience: What is the added value for policy and programming?
Subjective measures of climate resilience: What is the added value for policy and programming?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.07.001
复制
发表时间：
2017-09-01
影响因子：
8.9
通讯作者：
Conway, Declan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Clare, Abbie;Graber, Rebecca;Conway, Declan
衡量复原力的主观办法作为通常包含客观衡量标准的标准框架的补充办法，正在获得越来越多的关注。支持者认为，主观方法可以在三个方面增加现有措施的价值：通过提高我们对韧性驱动因素的理解，减少问卷调查对受访者的负担，并可能提供更有效的跨文化比较。这种观点评估了这些主张的潜力，证据和不确定性，从几十年的研究中使用主观技术在幸福和心理弹性文献中绘制。总的来说，我们发现主观方法理论上可以在这三个领域中增加价值。然而，适当指标的设计必须针对具体情况和严格的主观衡量标准，以增加气候抗御能力方案编制和政策的价值。
Subjective approaches to resilience measurement are gaining traction as a complementary approach to the standard frameworks that typically contain objective measures. Proponents suggest that subjective approaches may add value to existing measures in three areas: by improving our understanding of the drivers of resilience, reducing the questionnaire burden on respondents, and potentially offering more valid cross-cultural comparisons. This perspective assesses the potential, evidence and uncertainties around each of these claims, drawing from decades of research using subjective techniques in the wellbeing and psychological resilience literatures. Overall we find that subjective approaches can theoretically add value in each of these three areas. However the design of appropriate indicators must proceed with specificity and rigour for subjective measures to add value to programming and policy for climate resilience.