Response to Comments on “Apatite 4He/3He and (U-Th)/He Evidence for an Ancient Grand Canyon”
Response to Comments on “Apatite 4He/3He and (U-Th)/He Evidence for an Ancient Grand Canyon”
复制标题
对“磷灰石 4He/3He 和 (U-Th)/He 古代大峡谷证据”的评论的回应
作者：
Rebecca M. Flowers;K. A. Farley
我们重申，地质观测不需要大峡谷雕刻与科罗拉多河整合在一起。来自西部峡谷的(U-Th)/He数据，来自六个样本和两个实验室的总共29个可重复分析，令人信服地支持了一个古老峡谷。来自一个异常样本的三次分散分析并不能反驳这一结论，我们的模型所声称的缺点也没有有效性。
We reiterate that geological observations do not require Grand Canyon carving coeval with Colorado River integration. (U-Th)/He data from the western canyon, totaling 29 reproducible analyses from six samples and two labs, compellingly support an ancient canyon. Three dispersed analyses from one anomalous sample do not refute this conclusion, nor do the claimed shortcomings of our modeling have validity.