Peace and Justice, or Neither? The Repercussions of the al-Bashir Case for International Criminal Justice in Africa and Beyond
Peace and Justice, or Neither? The Repercussions of the al-Bashir Case for International Criminal Justice in Africa and Beyond
复制标题
和平与正义，还是两者都不是？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lutz Oette
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lutz Oette
国际刑事法院（ICC）检察官申请对苏丹总统巴希尔（al-Bashir）发出逮捕令，突显了联合国安理会和国际刑事法院在促进和平与正义方面的独特角色所固有的紧张关系。巴希尔案提出了关于根据《罗马规约》第16条推迟审判的合法性和政策方面的重要问题。非洲联盟在呼吁推迟的情况下，决定设立一个关于达尔富尔问题的高级别小组，就如何最好地实现正义与和解提出非洲的解决方案，这进一步增加了辩论的区域层面。巴希尔案的事态发展可能对各机构在追求正义和问责制方面的体制政策和效力以及国际刑事司法的未来进程，特别是在非洲，产生深远的影响。
The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) application for an arrest warrant against Sudan’s President al-Bashir has brought to the fore the tensions inherent in the distinctive roles of the UN Security Council and the ICC in furthering peace and justice. The al-Bashir case raises important questions about the legality and policy aspects of a deferral pursuant to Article 16 of the Rome Statute. The decision by the African Union, prompted by its calls for a deferral, to set up a High-Level Panel on Darfur to recommend African solutions on how best to achieve justice and reconciliation has added a further regional dimension to the debate. The developments in the al-Bashir case have potentially far-reaching repercussions for the institutional policies and efficacy of the respective bodies in pursuing justice and accountability, as well as for the future course of international criminal justice, particularly in Africa.