Causal Accounts of Harming

Causal Accounts of Harming
复制标题

伤害的因果解释

DOI:
10.1111/papq.12390
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
0.9
通讯作者:
Olle Risberg
Olle Risberg
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Erik Carlson;Jens Johansson;Olle Risberg

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

一个流行的伤害观是因果解释(CA),伤害就是造成伤害。CA有几个吸引人的特点。特别是,它似乎有能力处理其主要竞争对手反事实比较账户(CCA)的最重要问题。然而,我们认为,尽管它的优点,CA最终是一个不可接受的伤害理论。事实上,虽然CA避免了CCA的几个反例,但它很容易受到困扰CCA的一些问题的接近变体的影响。
A popular view of harming is the causal account (CA), on whichharming is causing harm. CA has several attractive features. In particular, it appears well equipped to deal with the most important problems for its main competitor, the counterfactual comparative account (CCA). However, we argue that, despite its advantages, CA is ultimately an unacceptable theory of harming. Indeed, while CA avoids several counterexamples to CCA, it is vulnerable to close variants of some of the problems that beset CCA.