Career Development Support in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: A National Survey of Fellows and Junior Faculty.

Career Development Support in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: A National Survey of Fellows and Junior Faculty.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/pcc.0000000000001097
复制
发表时间:
2017-04
期刊:
Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Riley CL
Riley CL
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cifra CL;Balikai SS;Murtha TD;Hsu B;Riley CL

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

确定当前儿科重症医学(PCCM)研究员和初级教师对在研究员培训期间获得的职业发展支持的程度和质量的看法。网络横断面调查于2015年9月至11月开放。研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认可的PCCM奖学金项目。PCCM研究员(二年级或以上)和初级教师(完成PCCM奖学金项目后5年内)。没有。该调查共有129名受访者,占acgme认证的PCCM奖学金项目的63%。受访者在研究员和初级教员之间平分秋色。近一半(49%)的受访者表示,他们的PCCM奖学金项目提供了正式的职业发展课程。理想的职业选择包括学术临床医生教育者(64%)、医师科学家(27%)、社区(非学术)临床医生(11%)和管理人员(11%)。项目提供的重点职业发展支持存在差异,少数项目为那些追求社区临床医生(32%)或管理人员(16%)的人提供了良好的支持。只有43%的学员认为他们有很好的机会获得理想的PCCM职位,最常见的障碍是有限的工作机会竞争加剧。大多数受访者表示对由国家专业组织赞助的PCCM职业发展专门项目感兴趣。大多数PCCM研究员和初级教师报告说,在研究期间,他们的职业发展得到了很好的支持。但是,仍然存在重要的差距,特别是那些追求社区(非学术)和行政途径的人。研究员对未来PCCM的就业和他们追求理想职业轨道的能力不确定。在PCCM中,专业组织可以为职业发展提供额外的资源。
To determine the perceptions of current pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) fellows and junior faculty regarding the extent and quality of career development support received during fellowship training. Web-based cross-sectional survey open from September to November 2015. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited PCCM fellowship programs. PCCM fellows (2nd year or higher) and junior faculty (within 5 years of completing a PCCM fellowship program). None. There were 129 respondents to the survey, representing 63% of ACGME-accredited PCCM fellowship programs. Respondents were evenly divided between fellows and junior faculty. Nearly half (49%) of respondents reported that their PCCM fellowship program provided a formal career development curriculum. Ideal career tracks chosen included academic clinician educator (64%), physician-scientist (27%), community-based (non-academic) clinician (11%), and administrator (11%). There was a disparity in focused career development support provided by programs, with a minority providing good support for those pursuing a community-based clinician track (32%) or administrator track (16%). Only 43% of fellows perceived that they have a good chance of obtaining their ideal PCCM position, with the most common perceived barrier being increased competition for limited job opportunities. Most respondents expressed interest in a program specific to PCCM career development that is sponsored by a national professional organization. Most PCCM fellows and junior faculty reported good to excellent career development support during fellowship. However, important gaps remain, particularly for those pursuing community-based (non-academic) and administrative tracks. Fellows were uncertain regarding future PCCM employment and their ability to pursue ideal career tracks. There may be a role for professional organizations to provide additional resources for career development in PCCM.