Bends and Ends of Surface Ruptures by
Bends and Ends of Surface Ruptures by
复制标题
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
G. Biasi;S. Wesnousky
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Biasi;S. Wesnousky
To improve the empirical basis for estimating the likely length of future earthquake ruptures on mapped active faults, we measure map-scale complexities including fault bends, discontinuous rupture, overlaps, and fault-to-fault rupture from 67 historical ruptures and analyze the measurements for statistical relationships relevant to seismic hazard analysis. We observe that angles of bends at the ends of surface ruptures on strike-slip faults are systematically larger than interior bends (IBs), whereas corresponding interior and ending populations are similar for dip-slip events. The probability of a strike-slip rupture passing a bend decreases systematically with increasing bend angle roughly as PR 3:1 − 0:083 × A, in which PR is the passing ratio and A is the bend angle, with values ranging between 5° and 30°. The regression shows the likelihood of a strike-slip rupture propagating through a bend of 25° is about 50%. The maximum IB angles through which ruptures propagate, and the net orientation differences of fault segments at the end of ruptures, may be explained to first order by changes in frictional resistance due to changes in fault strike in a locally constant orientation of regional stress. The average curvature of a fault rupture is defined by dividing the sum of absolute values of bends in the rupture by rupture length. Median and 95% curvatures of strike-slip ruptures are 0:5°=km and 1:5°=km, respectively; corresponding values for dip-slip ruptures are 1:6°=km and 5:6°=km, respectively. We find that most fault-to-fault rupture connections jump to a fault of like mechanism, such as strike slip to strike slip. Only two strike-slip ruptures out of a total of 42 jump to reverse structures and continue for a significant distance. Results here provide empirical data to support study of the dynamics of fault rupture and to improve rupture-length estimates for use in seismic hazard assessment. Electronic Supplement: Rupture maps annotated to show interpreted linear segments and measurements of bends in the ruptures. Introduction Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) depends directly on estimates of the rate and size of earthquakes on active faults. It is common practice in PSHA to develop an ensemble of potential ruptures that may occur on mapped active faults, based on fault geometry and length. Ruptures where slip jumps across discontinuities that appear as steps along a mapped fault trace are increasingly being considered in hazard analysis. PSHA thus requires assigning probabilities to the likelihood of a future rupture passing through these discontinuities. This motivates interest in acquiring further observations and developing methods to define and refine these probabilities. Previous studies focused on discontinuities in fault trace that appear as steps in a map view (e.g. Wesnousky, 1988, 2006; Lettis et al., 2002; Biasi and Wesnousky, 2016; hereafter, BW16); we here develop similar empirical observations from bends in past earthquake ruptures. The use of empirical observations to suggest that bends in fault trace play a role in fault rupture is not new. For example, King and Nabelek (1985) suggested bends in a fault trace might correlate with the initiation or termination of earthquake ruptures. Fliss et al. (2005) and Bhat et al. (2007) used physical models to explore the possibility that bends leading to branches in a fault trace might reflect rupture directivity. Ando et al. (2009) examined the San Andreas fault system of California to observe that the angles of splays bending from a fault trace are most commonly oriented about 17°. From this, they suggest that fault-tip stress may play a role in splay formation. Klinger (2010) considered a mix of both *Also at University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada Seismological Laboratory, MS-174, Reno, Nevada 89557. 2543 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 107, No. 6, pp. 2543–2560, December 2017, doi: 10.1785/0120160292