Mindfulness-based therapy: A comprehensive meta-analysis
Mindfulness-based therapy: A comprehensive meta-analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005
复制
发表时间：
2013-08-01
影响因子：
12.8
通讯作者：
Hofmann, Stefan G.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Khoury, Bassam;Lecomte, Tania;Hofmann, Stefan G.
背景：正念疗法（MBT）已成为一种流行的干预形式。然而，现有的综述报告了不一致的结果。目的：为了澄清文献中的这些不一致，我们进行了一项全面的效应量分析，以评估MBT的疗效。数据来源：从第一个可用日期到2013年5月10日，在PubMED或PsycINFO的期刊或论文中发表的研究的系统综述。共209项研究结果：样本量估计表明MBT在前后比较中具有中等有效性（n = 72; Hedge的g = .55），与等待列表对照相比（n = 67; Hedge的g = .53），并与其他积极治疗（n = 68; Hedge的g = .33），包括其他心理治疗（n = 35; Hedge的g = .22）相比。MBT与传统的CBT或行为疗法（n = 9; Hedge的g =-0.07）或药物治疗（n = 3; Hedge的g = .13）没有差异。结论：MBT是一种有效的治疗各种心理问题的方法，特别是有效地减少焦虑，抑郁和压力。(c)2013爱思唯尔有限公司保留所有权利。
Background: Mindfulness-based therapy (MBT) has become a popular form of intervention. However, the existing reviews report inconsistent findings.Objective: To clarify these inconsistencies in the literature, we conducted a comprehensive effect-size analysis to evaluate the efficacy of MBT.Data sources: A systematic review of studies published in journals or in dissertations in PubMED or PsycINFO from the first available date until May 10, 2013.Review methods: A total of 209 studies (n = 12,145) were included.Results: Effect-size estimates suggested that MBT is moderately effective in pre-post comparisons (n = 72; Hedge's g = .55), in comparisons with waitlist controls (n = 67; Hedge's g = .53), and when compared with other active treatments (n = 68; Hedge's g = .33), including other psychological treatments (n = 35; Hedge's g = .22). MBT did not differ from traditional CBT or behavioral therapies (n = 9; Hedge's g = -.07) or pharmacological treatments (n = 3; Hedge's g = .13).Conclusion: MBT is an effective treatment for a variety of psychological problems, and is especially effective for reducing anxiety, depression, and stress. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.