Coercion as Enforcement, and the Social Organisation of Power Relations: Coercion in Specific Contexts of Social Power
Coercion as Enforcement, and the Social Organisation of Power Relations: Coercion in Specific Contexts of Social Power
复制标题
作为执行的强制，以及权力关系的社会组织：特定社会权力背景下的强制
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Scott A. Anderson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Scott A. Anderson
最近关于胁迫的许多理论扩大了胁迫概念的范围，包括一个行为者迫使另一个行为者采取行动的相互作用，但须有一些进一步的限定。我之前已经论证过，这种概念化胁迫的方式破坏了它在政治和伦理学中理论应用的适用性。我还阐述了一种更狭隘、更传统的方法--“强制执行方法”--并论证了它的优越性。在这篇文章中，我认为扩大这种更传统的方法的前景，以涵盖一些情况下，似乎不适合这种方法，但似乎强制性的，如要求经常对人的信用卡公司，要求学生的高等教育机构，并要求由欧洲金融机构对希腊政府。我分析的相似性和差异，这些相比，更中心的情况下，胁迫，讨论什么教训可以从这种分析。
Many recent theories of coercion broaden the scope of the concept coercion by encompassing interactions in which one agent pressures another to act, subject to some further qualifications. I have argued previously that this way of conceptualizing coercion undermines its suitability for theoretical use in politics and ethics. I have also explicated a narrower, more traditional approach—“the enforcement approach to coercion”—and argued for its superiority. In this essay, I consider the prospects for broadening this more traditional approach to cover some cases that don’t seem to fit this approach, but nonetheless seem coercive, such as the demands routinely made on people by credit card companies, demands on students by higher educational institutions, and demands made by European financial institutions on the government of Greece. I analyze the similarities and differences of these compared to more central cases of coercion, discussing what lessons can be drawn from this analysis.