Environmental inequalities: reflections on a transdisciplinary seminar series
Environmental inequalities: reflections on a transdisciplinary seminar series
复制标题
环境不平等：跨学科研讨会系列的反思
DOI：
10.1080/13549830802475468
复制
发表时间：
2008
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Walker G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Walker G
英国兰开斯特大学兰开斯特环境中心地理系; bBRESE，布鲁内尔商学院，乌克斯布里奇UB 8 3 PH，英国在上一期关于英国环境正义（EJ）的《地方环境》特刊中（第10卷，第4期，2005年），术语和思想的EJ进入欧洲，特别是进入英国，标志着和欢迎。通过一系列涉及洪水、污染、交通、废物、性别和贫困问题的文件，可以看出，环境正义的既定概念和关切是如何在新的社会、文化和政治背景下出现的，如何将北美长期以来的论述内容融入有时十分不同的环境活动家传统和体制环境中。2005年特刊中强调的两个显著特点（Bullivan和步行者，2005年）是：（i）一个激进的扩大范围的环境正义框架，包括远远超过地方为基础的种族和污染议程的美国传统（如英国关于环境和社会正义的广泛研究和证据审查所示; Lucas等人，2004年），以及（ii）至少将该环境正义框架的某些要素纳入政策团体的关注和工作中，与一系列现有的可持续性、社会排斥和健康不平等议程建立战略联系（查尔默斯和科尔文，2005年）。虽然收集的论文集中在地理学家的工作，很明显，推进这个重新语境化的版本的地球正义将需要一个彻底的跨学科的企业，汇集了多个学科的专业知识，多个非政府组织和多个政策社区。
Gordon Walkera* and Malcolm Eamesb aDepartment of Geography, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK; bBRESE, Brunel Business School, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UKIn a previous special issue of Local Environment on environmental justice (EJ) in the UK (Volume 10, no. 4, 2005), the arrival of the terminology and ideas of EJ into Europe, and particularly into the UK, was marked and welcomed. Across a set of papers covering issues of flooding, pollution, traffic, waste, gender and deprivation, it was shown how established concepts and concerns of EJ were emerging in a new social, cultural and political context, integrating elements of the long established North American discourse into sometimes quite different environmental activist traditions and institutional settings. Two distinctive features emphasised in the 2005 special issue (Bulkeley and Walker 2005) were:(i) a radical broadening of the scope of the EJ frame to include far more than the place-based race and pollution agenda of the US tradition (as demonstrated in a wide ranging research and evidence review on environmental and social justice in the UK; Lucas et al. 2004) and (ii) the assimilation of at least some elements of this EJ frame into the concerns and work of policy communities, making strategic links with a range of existing sustainability, social exclusion and health inequalities agendas (Chalmers and Colvin 2005). Although the collection of papers concentrated on the work of geographers, it was clear that advancing this re-contextualised version of EJ would need to be a thoroughly transdisciplinary enterprise, bringing together the expertise of multiple academic disciplines, multiple non-governmental groups and multiple policy communities.
环境正义：英国的新议程
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
H. Bulkeley;G. Walker
通讯作者：
G. Walker