'Objective' vs 'subjective' job insecurity:: Consequences of temporary work for job satisfaction and organizational commitment in four European countries
'Objective' vs 'subjective' job insecurity:: Consequences of temporary work for job satisfaction and organizational commitment in four European countries
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0143831x03024002002
复制
发表时间：
2003-05-01
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Näswall, K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
De Witte, H;Näswall, K
这篇文章分析了临时工作和工作不安全感(主观感觉)是否像文献中所建议的那样与工作满意度和组织承诺的降低有关。还测试了临时工作和工作不安全感之间的相互作用。来自四个欧洲国家(比利时、荷兰、意大利和瑞典)的数据被用来检验假设的稳健性。研究结果表明，临时性工作与工作满意度和组织承诺的降低无关。正如假设的那样，工作不安全感与这两个结果变量的得分较低有关。在两个国家，发现了一种互动关系：工作不安全感只与拥有长期合同的工人的工作满意度和组织承诺下降有关，这表明这类工人违反了心理契约。
This contribution analyses whether temporary work and (the subjective perception of) job insecurity are associated with a reduction in job satisfaction and organizational commitment, as proposed in the literature. An interaction between temporary work and job insecurity is also tested. Data from four European countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy and Sweden) are used to test the robustness of the hypotheses. The results show that temporary work is not associated with a reduction in job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Job insecurity is associated with a lower score on both outcome variables, as hypothesized. In two countries, an interaction was found: job insecurity was only associated with a reduction in job satisfaction and organizational commitment among workers with a permanent contract, suggesting that the psychological contract was violated for this category of workers.