Naturalization Policies, Education and Citizenship
Naturalization Policies, Education and Citizenship
复制标题
入籍政策、教育和公民身份
DOI：
10.1057/9781137315519_2
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kiwan D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kiwan D
关于公民身份的一个中心争论是，我们是否已经目睹或正在目睹“国家”公民身份的消亡。典型的例子是Soysal（1994）的开创性著作《公民身份的限制》，她在书中根据对德国的土耳其客工的研究，论证了欧洲“后国民”成员资格的相对优势。根据这一分析，全球化、国际人权论述和法律的规范的兴起以及国际和区域体制机制导致民族国家的重要性下降，因为权利不再是公民专有的，永久居民也可以享有。同样，萨森（2002年）认为，随着全球经济造成的跨国移民流动，公民身份正在重新配置，并正在经历“部分剥夺国籍”。
One of the central debates in citizenship concerns whether we have witnessed, or are witnessing, the demise of ‘national’ citizenship. Typically, reference is made to Soysal’s (1994) seminal work,Limits of Citizenship, where she argues the case of the relative ascendency of ‘postnational’ membership in Europe, based on her study of Turkish guestworkers in Germany. According to this analysis, globalization, the rise of international human rights discourses and legal norms, and international and regional institutional mechanisms have led to the decline in importance of the nation state, as rights are no longer exclusive to citizens but also available to permanent residents. Similarly, Sassen (2002) has argued that with transnational flows of immigration as a consequence of the global economy, citizenship is being reconfigured and is undergoing a ‘partial denationalizing’.