Monosomy 7 in t(9;22)-negative cells during nilotinib therapy in an imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia case.
Monosomy 7 in t(9;22)-negative cells during nilotinib therapy in an imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia case.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2006.12.011
复制
发表时间:
2007-07
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Zeidan;S. Kakati;B. Anderson;M. Barcos;M. Wetzler
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Zeidan;S. Kakati;B. Anderson;M. Barcos;M. Wetzler
A 33-year-old white female was diagnosed with t (9; 22)-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in December 2004 and was started on imatinib at 400 mg daily. She achieved only minor cytogenetic response after eight months of treatment and therefore imatinib was increased to 600 mg daily. The patient then developed grade III thrombocytopenia that persisted despite reducing the imatinib dose. She was therefore enrolled on a phase II dose-escalation study of oral nilotinib 400 mg twice daily on October 2005. The patient responded to nilotinib with mild thrombocytopenia but as she started to develop cytogenetic response, de novo abnormal clone with monosomy 7 (45, XX,-7) and dysplastic changes started to appear in the marrow (Figure). Therefore, in September 2006 the patient taken off nilotininb with plans to switch to dasatinib and evaluate for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of monosomy 7 arising in t (9; 22)-negative cells in an imatinib-resistant CML patient during nilotinib therapy. The appearance of cytogenetic aberrations in t (9; 22)-negative cells has been rarely reported following chemotherapy [1], interferon [2] and in approximately 2% to 17% of patients following imatinib therapy [3–7]. Few of these patients developed myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML); especially those with monosomy 7 [reviewed in 7]. The mechanisms to explain the emergence of such abnormal clones are not clear. It was postulated that the t (9; 22)-negative clone may have predated the acquisition of the t (9; 22) translocation in a two-step mechanism for CML pathogenesis. Another closely-related explanation [5] is the presence of several abnormal clones after the patient’s hematopoiesis has been subjected to genetic damage. One of these clones carries the t (9; 22) and is at a proliferative advantage therefore masking the underlying clonal diversity. The selective pressure applied by imatinib, or nilotinib in our case, therapy could suppress the proliferation of cells with t (9; 22) which allows the monosomy 7 clone to grow. This may explain the higher frequency of t (9; 22)-negative clones arising in response to therapy with imatinib than with interferon, as imatinib is generally more effective in suppressing the t (9; 22)-positive clone than interferon [6]. The