Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis.
Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00348
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Campbell MJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Clancy RB;Herring MP;Campbell MJ
动机在运动心理学和其他领域都得到了广泛的研究。由于严格的测量对于理解这种潜在的结构是必不可少的，因此需要对测量仪器进行批判性的评估。因此，本综述的目的是评估体育运动中最常被引用的六种激励措施。本文检索了2016年8月之前发表的同行评审文章，确定了六份被引用率最高的体育动机问卷：体育动机量表（SMS）、内在动机量表（IMI）、情境动机量表（SIMS）、成功感知问卷（POSQ）、体育行为调节问卷（BRSQ）和体育任务与自我取向问卷（TEOSQ）。然后对问卷进行评估和讨论，分为四个部分：开发、可靠性、相关性和总结。还计算了文献计量学数据（平均加权影响因子）并进行了评估（例如，每年的引用数），以评估使用每个问卷的影响。尽管在心理测量性质、概念、结构和效用方面存在一些差异，但这六份问卷在心理测量学上是量化动机的有力工具，得到了文献的广泛支持。文献计量学分析表明，IMI和SMS分别根据其原始出版物的平均加权影响因子排名第一和第六。考虑到每个问卷的心理测量优势/局限性，以及在具体研究问题的背景下对动机的概念化，应该指导研究人员选择最合适的工具来测量运动中的动机。每个问卷的平均加权影响因子也是一个有用的考虑值。考虑到这些要点，本文提供了一些建议。
Motivation is widely-researched, in both sport psychology and other fields. As rigorous measurement is essential to understanding this latent construct, a critical appraisal of measurement instruments is needed. Thus, the purpose of this review was to evaluate the six most highly cited motivation measures in sport. Peer-reviewed articles published prior to August 2016 were searched to identify the six most highly cited motivation questionnaires in sport: Sport Motivation Scale (SMS), Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), Situational Motivational Scale (SIMS), Perceptions of Success Questionnaire (POSQ), Behavioural Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ), and Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ). The questionnaires were then evaluated and discussed in four sections: Development, Reliability, Correlates, and Summary. Bibliometric data were also calculated (average weighted impact factor) and assessed (e.g., citations per year) to evaluate the impact of the use of each questionnaire. Despite some variance in their psychometric properties, conceptualization, structure, and utility, the six questionnaires are psychometrically strong instruments for quantifying motivation that are widely supported in the literature. Bibliometric analyses suggested that the IMI ranks first and the SMS ranks sixth according to the average weighted impact factors of their original publications. Consideration of each questionnaire's psychometric strengths/limitations, and conceptualization of motivation in the context of specific research questions should guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate instrument to measure motivation in sport. The average weighted impact factor of each questionnaire is a useful value to consider as well. With these points in mind, recommendations are provided.