Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitor Designed for Patients With Heart Failure Supported with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.
Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitor Designed for Patients With Heart Failure Supported with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/mat.0000000000000775
复制
发表时间:
2019-03
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Johnson BD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sajgalik P;Kremen V;Fabian V;Maltais S;Stulak JM;Kushwaha SS;Joyce LD;Schirger JA;Johnson BD
The gold standard for noninvasive blood pressure (BP) measurement, the Doppler technique does not provide systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) pressure and may limit therapy outcomes. To improve patient care, we tested specifically designed Experimental BP (ExpBP) monitor and the Doppler technique by comparing non-invasive measures to the intra-arterial (I-A) BP in 31 end-stage heart failure patients (4 females) 2.6±3.4 days post-LVAD implantation (20 HeartMate II and 11 HeartWare). Bland-Altman (B-A) plots revealed that the ExpBP monitor overestimated mean arterial pressure (MAP) by 1.2 [4.8] mm Hg (mean difference [SD]), while the Doppler by 6.7 [5.8] mm Hg. The Exp BP SBP was overestimated by 0.8 [6.1] mm Hg and DBP by 1.9 [5.3] mm Hg compared to the respective I-A pressures. Both techniques achieved similar measurement reliability. In the measurement “success rate” expressed as a frequency (percent) of readable BP values per measurement attempts, Doppler accomplished 100% vs. 97%, 97% and 94% of successful detections of MAP, SBP and DBP provided by the ExpBP monitor. The ExpBP monitor demonstrated higher accuracy in the MAP assessment than the Doppler in addition to providing SBP and DBP in majority of subjects. Improved BP control may help to mitigate related neurologic adverse event rates.