Mechanisms of mindfulness: Emotion regulation following a focused breathing induction

Mechanisms of mindfulness: Emotion regulation following a focused breathing induction
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.007
复制
发表时间:
2006-12-01
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Craske, Michelle G.
Craske, Michelle G.
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Arch, Joanna J.;Craske, Michelle G.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目前的研究调查了在一个正常的,主要是本科生人群中记录的15分钟集中呼吸诱导是否会降低情绪反应的强度和消极性,以情感评价图片幻灯片,并增加愿意保持接触厌恶的图片幻灯片。将集中呼吸诱导的效果与15分钟记录的不集中注意力和担忧诱导的效果进行比较。集中呼吸组在诱导前后对中性幻灯片保持一致的、适度的积极反应,而不集中注意力和担心组在诱导后对中性幻灯片的反应比诱导前明显更消极。集中呼吸组也报告了对诱导后幻灯片的负面影响和整体情绪波动低于担心组,并且比不集中注意力组更愿意观看高度负面的幻灯片。响应于最后的幻灯片块的较低报告的负面和总体影响,以及由专注呼吸组观看可选负面幻灯片的更大意愿可以被视为对负面刺激的更适应性响应。讨论的结果是一致的正念情绪调节特性。(c)2006爱思唯尔有限公司保留所有权利。
The current study investigated whether a 15 min recorded focused breathing induction in a normal, primarily undergraduate population would decrease the intensity and negativity of emotional responses to affectively valenced picture slides and increase willingness to remain in contact with aversive picture slides. The effects of the focused breathing induction were compared with the effects of 15 min recorded inductions of unfocused attention and worrying. The focused breathing group maintained consistent, moderately positive responses to the neutral slides before and after the induction, whereas the unfocused attention and worry groups responded significantly more negatively to the neutral slides after the induction than before it. The focusing breathing group also reported lower negative affect and overall emotional volatility in response to the post-induction slides than the worry group, and greater willingness to view highly negative slides than the unfocused attention group. The lower-reported negative and overall affect in response to the final slide blocks, and greater willingness to view optional negative slides by the focused breathing group may be viewed as more adaptive responding to negative stimuli. The results are discussed as being consistent with emotional regulatory properties of mindfulness. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.