The Structure of Discussions that Promote Reasoning
The Structure of Discussions that Promote Reasoning
复制标题
促进推理的讨论结构
DOI：
10.1177/016146819810000205
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Richard C. Anderson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Chinn;Richard C. Anderson
以学生之间的理性论证为特色的讨论有可能提高学生的动机，帮助学生学会推理。本文分析了儿童在讨论所读故事中提出的问题时所产生的议论语篇的结构。两个互补的方法来表示的论证结构。第一种方法是论证网络，它将学生群体中的论证表示为前提和结论的连锁网络。第二种方法是因果网络，它主要将论证表现为因果关联的叙事序列中的事件。我们讨论了这两种方法的教学和研究的影响。论证网络和因果网络提供了教师和学生如何改善讨论的见解，并提出了促进学生推理发展的教学策略。
Discussions featuring reasoned argumentation among students have the potential to increase students’ motivation and to help students learn to reason well. This article analyzes the structure of the argumentative discourse produced when children discuss issues raised by stories they have read. Two complementary approaches are developed to represent the structure of the argumentation. The first approach, the argument network, represents argumentation within groups of students as an interlocking web of premises and conclusions. The second approach, the causal network, represents the argumentation primarily as events linked in a causally connected narrative sequence. We discuss implications of these two approaches for instruction and research. Argument networks and causal networks provide insights into how teachers and students can improve discussions, and they suggest instructional strategies that can promote the development of students’ reasoning.