POLITICAL MORAL LAXITY AS A SYMPTOM OF SYSTEM JUSTIFICATION IN ARGENTINA, COLOMBIA, AND PERU
POLITICAL MORAL LAXITY AS A SYMPTOM OF SYSTEM JUSTIFICATION IN ARGENTINA, COLOMBIA, AND PERU
复制标题
DOI：
10.4473/tpm29.1.4
复制
发表时间：
2022-03-01
影响因子：
0.7
通讯作者：
Molina, Nelson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Espinosa, Agustin;Cakal, Huseyin;Molina, Nelson
政治道德松弛（Political moral laxity，PML）是指公民所持有的一系列政治信仰和态度，这些信仰和态度容忍并支持政治家和当局的不诚实和腐败行为。在这种情况下，本研究的目的是分析如何意识形态和社会优势取向（SDO），合法性的看法，并在机构（政府，国会和司法）的信任与PML在三个拉丁美洲国家（阿根廷，哥伦比亚和秘鲁）。为此，在上述三个国家的公民（n = 854）中进行了调查研究。结果表明，SDO直接和一致地预测了这三个国家的道德松弛。同样，在哥伦比亚和秘鲁，人们认为政治制度缺乏合法性与道德松弛成反比;尽管它预测道德松弛只发生在后一个国家。另一方面，研究结果表明，道德松弛是一个症状指标的保守表达的系统的理由，一个良好的行使治理，透明度，程序和分配正义并不总是提供给广大的公民群体。
Political moral laxity (PML) is defined as a set of political beliefs and attitudes held by citizens that tolerate and favor dishonest and corrupt actions on the part of politicians and authorities. In this scenario, the objective of this study is to analyze how ideology and social dominance orientation (SDO), perceptions of legitimacy, and trust in institutions (government, congress, and judiciary) are related to PML in three Latin American countries (Argentina, Colombia, and Peru). To this end, a survey study was carried out among citizens from the three countries mentioned above (n = 854). The results show that moral laxity is predicted directly and consistently in all three countries, by SDO. Likewise, perceived lack of legitimacy in the political system is inversely related to moral laxity in Colombia and Peru; although it predicts moral laxity only in the latter country. On the other hand, the results show that moral laxity is a symptomatic indicator of conservative expressions of system justification where a good exercise of governance, transparency, and procedural and distributive justice are not always available for vast groups of citizens.