The Gold Standard for Assessing Creativity
The Gold Standard for Assessing Creativity
复制标题
评估创造力的黄金标准
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Sharon S. McKool
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
John Baer;Sharon S. McKool
最广泛使用的创造力评估是发散思维测试，但这些和其他流行的创造力测量已被证明有效性很小。视觉评估技术是创造力研究人员使用的一种强大工具，要求专家评审小组对故事，拼贴画，诗歌和其他文物等创意产品的创造力进行评估。主观评估技术是基于这样一种想法，即衡量一件艺术作品、一个理论、一项研究计划或任何其他人工制品的创造力的最佳方法是该领域专家的综合评估。与其他衡量创造力的方法不同，主观评估技术并不基于任何特定的创造力理论，这意味着它的有效性（已经在经验上得到了很好的确立）并不依赖于任何特定的创造力理论的有效性。创造力评价技术被认为是创造力研究的“金标准”，在高等教育创造力评价中具有重要的应用价值。
The most widely used creativity assessments are divergent thinking tests, but these and other popular creativity measures have been shown to have little validity. The Consensual Assessment Technique is a powerful tool used by creativity researchers in which panels of expert judges are asked to rate the creativity of creative products such as stories, collages, poems, and other artifacts. The Consensual Assessment Technique is based on the idea that the best measure of the creativity of a work of art, a theory, a research proposal, or any other artifact is the combined assessment of experts in that field. Unlike other measures of creativity, the Consensual Assessment Technique is not based on any particular theory of creativity, which means that its validity (which has been well established empirically) is not dependent upon the validity of any particular theory of creativity. The Consensual Assessment Technique has been deemed the “gold standard” in creativity research and can be very useful in creativity assessment in higher education.