Factors affecting the family development index in Indonesia: a cross-sectional survey in Aceh, a region with a 30 year armed conflict experience
Factors affecting the family development index in Indonesia: a cross-sectional survey in Aceh, a region with a 30 year armed conflict experience
复制标题
影响印度尼西亚家庭发展指数的因素：对有30年武装冲突经历的亚齐地区进行的横断面调查
DOI：
10.12688/f1000research.126777.1
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Syarifah Nora Andriaty
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Yani;H. Puspitawati;T. M. Ilzana;Oktriyanto Oktriyanto;R. Damanik;T. M. Khaled;Cut Riska Rahmi;Raisha Fathima;Samsul Anwar;Syarifah Nora Andriaty
背景：需要衡量家庭发展指数，以确保政府做出最佳努力，为家庭提供幸福，并在一个具有独特条件的地区制定家庭发展战略。这项研究的目的是评估亚齐省的家庭发展指数及其相关决定因素，亚齐省是印度尼西亚实施《锡里亚法》的地区，有30年的武装冲突经验。方法：在亚齐省所有地区进行横断面调查。这项研究是印度尼西亚国家人口和计划生育委员会项目的一部分。这项调查包括从每个随机选择的家庭中挑选一个人。采用由15个问题组成的调查问卷测量家庭发展指数。通过面对面的访谈收集和评估了看似合理的决定因素。家庭发展指数用85%的分界点划分为好和差。使用两步Logistic回归来确定相关的决定因素。结果：最终进入分析的家庭数为1万户。家庭发展指数良好的占86.6%，其中沙邦最高(97.6%)，亚齐辛基尔最低(76.6%)。多因素分析显示，摄政王、婚姻状况、文化程度、医疗保险拥有率、出生证拥有率、房屋质量(楼层类型、电源、饮用水来源、厕所设施类型)与家庭发展指数有关。结论：尽管亚齐是印度尼西亚最不发达的省份之一，有着长期的武装冲突经历，但我们的数据表明，亚齐的家庭发展指数相对较高，该指数受到经济和非经济决定因素的影响。为了进一步提高家庭发展指数，关键是要发展区域和国家的经济和非经济组成部分。
Background: Family development index needs to be measured to ensure that the government has made optimal efforts to provide happiness to the families and to develop strategies in family development in a region with unique conditions. The objective of this study was to assess the family development index and its associated determinants in Aceh province, a region implementing Syariah Law in Indonesia with 30 years of armed conflict experience. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in all regencies in Aceh. The study was a part of the Indonesian National Population and Family Planning Board project. The survey included one individual from each household that was selected randomly. Family development index was measured using a questionnaire consisting of 15 questions. The plausible determinants were collected and assessed through a face-to-face interview. The family development index was dichotomized using 85% cut-off into good and poor. A two-step logistic regression was used to determine the associated determinants. Results: A total of 10,000 households were included in the final analysis. 86.6% had a good family development index, with the highest in Sabang (97.6%) and the lowest index in Aceh Singkil (76.6%), respectively. A multivariate analysis indicated that the regency, marital status, educational qualification, ownership of health insurance, ownership of childbirth certificate, quality of the house (the type of floor, the source of electricity, the source of drinking water and the type of toilet facility) were associated with the family development index. Conclusion: Despite Aceh being one of the less developed provinces in Indonesia with long armed conflict experience, our data suggest that the family development index is relatively high and the index is influenced both by economic and non-economic determinants. To further improve the family development index, it is critical to develop both economic and non-economic components in the region and in the country.