Does Survey Nonresponse Bias Estimates of Religious Service Attendance? Evidence from an Address-Based Sample from the Boston Area

Does Survey Nonresponse Bias Estimates of Religious Service Attendance? Evidence from an Address-Based Sample from the Boston Area
复制标题

调查无答复对宗教服务出席率的估计存在偏差吗?

DOI:
10.1093/socrel/sry031
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
Brenner, Philip S
Brenner, Philip S
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brenner, Philip S

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

本研究使用旨在估计无答复偏差的多模式调查,调查了无答复在夸大宗教行为调查估计中所起的作用(如果有的话)。从基于地址的框架中抽取的 3,000 个波士顿地区家庭样本被随机分为两个子样本,通过邮件联系并邀请参加调查。第一个子样本被要求完成交互式语音应答采访。如果该地址有可用号码,则要求第二个子样本通过电话完成调查;如果没有,则通过个人访谈完成调查。最后,重新联系未受访者的随机样本进行个人访谈。对样本段内初次访谈与无受访者访谈的出席率估计进行比较,会产生微小或极小的差异,这些差异在统计上并不显着。研究结果表明,产生调查无答复的机制不太可能是本研究中宗教仪式出席人数估计偏差的主要原因。
This study investigates what role, if any, nonresponse plays in inflating survey estimates of religious behavior, using a multimode survey designed to allow estimation of nonresponse bias. A sample of 3,000 Boston-area households drawn from an address-based frame was randomly divided into two subsamples, contacted by mail, and invited to participate in a survey. The first subsample was asked to complete an interactive voice response interview. The second subsample was asked to complete a survey by telephone if a number was available for the address or by personal interview if not. Finally, random samples of nonrespondents were recontacted for a personal interview. Comparison of attendance estimates from initial interviews with nonrespondent interviews within sample segments yields minor or minimal differences that are not statistically significant. Findings suggest that the mechanism generating survey nonresponse is unlikely to be a major cause of bias in religious service attendance estimates in this study.
公众对人口普查的态度:影响和趋势*
DOI: --
发表时间: 2004
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Weakliem;W. Villemez
通讯作者: W. Villemez
DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfl035
发表时间: 2006-01-01
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Keeter, Scott;Kennedy, Courtney;Craighill, Peyton
通讯作者: Craighill, Peyton
多报美国的教会出席率 : 需要同样判决的证据 : 美国的教会出席率
DOI: 10.2307/2657484
发表时间: 1998
影响因子: 9.1
作者:
C. Kirk;Hadaway;P. Marler;Mark Chaves
通讯作者: Mark Chaves
DOI: 10.2307/2657486
发表时间: 1998-02
影响因子: 9.1
作者:
Stanley Presser;Linda Stinson
通讯作者: Stanley Presser;Linda Stinson
DOI: 10.2307/2095948
发表时间: 1993-12-01
影响因子: 9.1
作者:
HADAWAY, CK;MARLER, PL;CHAVES, M
通讯作者: CHAVES, M