Translating science to practice: Community and academic perspectives
Translating science to practice: Community and academic perspectives
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/01.phh.0000311892.73078.8b
复制
发表时间：
2008-03-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Kerner, Jon F.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Colditz, Graham A.;Emmons, Karen M.;Kerner, Jon F.
虽然证据审查为实践和政策指南提供了信息，但指南与实施之间的差距可能正在扩大。我们将传播和实施研究置于推动研究付诸实践所需的其他变革的背景下。需要多层次的研究和传播方法，以及为学术任命和晋升提供信息的指标。从社区的角度来看，超越随赠款周期停止和启动的资助是确保连续性和改善健康状况的一个关键问题。跨越学科界限来开发共享概念框架的跨学科方法可能有助于加速研究与实践的整合。确定并实施结构性变革以发展和支持跨学科团队可能会进一步促进这一过程。改变用于构建和实施科学进步的方法将有助于发挥促进人口健康的巨大潜力。
While evidence reviews inform practice and policy guidelines, the gap between guidelines and implementation may be growing. We place dissemination and implementation research in the context of other changes needed to drive research into practice. Multilevel approaches to research and dissemination are needed as are metrics to inform academic appointment and promotions. Moving beyond funding that stops and starts with grant cycles is a key issue from the community perspective to ensure continuity and improved health. Transdisciplinary approaches that cut across disciplinary boundaries to develop shared conceptual frameworks may help speed the integration of research with practice. Identifying and implementing structural changes to develop and support transdisciplinary teams may further facilitate this process. Changes in the approaches used to structure and implement scientific advances into practice will help achieve the enormous potential to advance the health of the population.