Design and Dissensus : Framing and staging participation in design research
Design and Dissensus : Framing and staging participation in design research
复制标题
设计与分歧：设计研究的框架和分阶段参与
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Mazé
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Keshavarz;R. Mazé
当代设计解决社会问题并在公共领域运作，它解决了与传统设计所服务的更多样化的人、群体和“其他人”相关的问题。追溯早期参与式设计运动中的一些相关问题，我们质疑基于“共识”的方法，并探索基于“分歧”的替代方案，如政治哲学中的理论化。为了讨论参与设计的关键政治方面，分歧是一个回顾性的镜头，用于反思我们自己基于实践的研究的例子。 “抵抗形式”是与伊朗和瑞典的女性活动家团体共同开展的一个项目，其中一名设计研究人员参与了一系列社会物质活动，以认识那些被排除在现行政治秩序之外的人的经历和主观性。另类的交流和美学实践是为了应对研究情境和场所内部和之间的公平、权力和差异问题而发展的，这些问题是与“无纪律”和“自由翻译”的概念相关的讨论。本文讨论了设计中框架和分阶段参与的替代方法，阐明了与设计和设计研究的社会和批判实践相关的一系列术语和概念。
Addressing social issues and operating in the public realm, contemporary design engages with the problematics of relating to more diverse people, groups and ‘others’ than those traditionally served by design. Tracing some related concerns within the early Participatory Design movements, we query approaches based on ‘consensus’ and explore an alternative based on ‘dissensus’, as theorized within political philosophy. To discuss critical-political aspects of participation in design, dissensus is a lens applied retrospectively to reflect on an example of our own practice-based research. Carried out with groups of women activists in Iran and Sweden, ‘Forms of Resistance’ was a project in which a design researcher engaged a series of socio-material activities to recognize the experiences and subjectivities of those otherwise excluded from a prevailing political order. Alternative communication and aesthetic practices were developed in response to issues of equity, power and difference within and across research situations and sites, which are discussed in relation to concepts of ‘indisciplinarity’ and ‘free translation’. This paper discusses alternative approaches to framing and staging participation in design, elucidating a series of terms and concepts relevant to social and critical practices of design and design research.