Recency effects in face-to-face interaction.
Recency effects in face-to-face interaction.
复制标题
面对面互动中的近因效应。
DOI：
10.1037/h0025717
复制
发表时间：
1968
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
C. Insko
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Wilson;C. Insko
STOOGES创造了一个顺序效应的范例，通过在一个修改后的囚徒困境游戏中做出合作然后竞争，或竞争然后合作的选择，他们与160名本科生一起玩。与许多早期的研究中涉及到与他人的交流不同，这里报告的这两项研究涉及到与他人的面对面交流，并显示出人格印象形成的近期效应而不是初级效应。数据不支持N。米勒和DT坎贝尔（见34：3）有序效应模型。与集合或刺激变异解释相反，重复降低（无显著性）而不是增加最近效应。(18参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2017阿帕，保留所有权利）
STOOGES CREATED AN ORDER-EFFECT PARADIGM BY MAKING COOPERATIVE AND THEN COMPETITIVE, OR COMPETITIVE AND THEN COOPERATIVE CHOICES IN A MODIFIED PRISONER'S DILEMMA GAME WHICH THEY PLAYED WITH 160 UNDERGRADUATES. IN CONTRAST TO A NUMBER OF EARLIER STUDIES WHICH INVOLVED DESCRIPTIONS OF OTHER PERSONS, THE 2 STUDIES REPORTED HERE INVOLVED FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION WITH OTHER PERSONS AND SHOWED A RECENCY RATHER THAN A PRIMACY EFFECT IN PERSONALITY IMPRESSION FORMATION. THE DATA DID NOT SUPPORT THE N. MILLER AND DT CAMPBELL (SEE 34: 3) MODEL OF ORDER EFFECTS. CONTRARY TO A SET OR STIMULUS VARIATION INTERPRETATION, A PRERATING REDUCED (NONSIGNIFICANTLY) RATHER THAN INCREASED THE RECENCY EFFECT.(18 REF.)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)