Transparency in Transcribing: Making Visible Theoretical Bases Impacting Knowledge Construction from Open-Ended Interview Records
Transparency in Transcribing: Making Visible Theoretical Bases Impacting Knowledge Construction from Open-Ended Interview Records
复制标题
转录的透明度：从开放式访谈记录中建立影响知识构建的可见理论基础
DOI：
10.17169/fqs-13.1.1532
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Audra Skukauskaitė
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Audra Skukauskaitė
本文介绍了一个开放式采访的两个成绩单的自反性分析，并认为在转录过程和结果的透明度。本文通过分析研究者的理论如何在开放式访谈的文本制作和使用中发挥重要作用，说明了研究和提出转录决策的理论基础的重要性。虽然跨学科的学者认为，转录是一个理论负载的过程（绿色，FRANQUIZ &狄克逊，1997; KVALE & BRINKMAN，2009），很少有人从事数据历史的反思性分析，以证明特定的理论和方法论方法在产生知识主张和煽动跨传统对话方面所带来的后果。本文展示了如何在转录理论方法主张关系影响研究的透明度和可追溯性。URN：http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201146
This article presents a reflexive analysis of two transcripts of an open-ended interview and argues for transparency in transcribing processes and outcomes. By analyzing ways in which a researcher's theories become consequential in producing and using transcripts of an open-ended interview, this paper makes visible the importance of examining and presenting theoretical bases of transcribing decisions. While scholars across disciplines have argued that transcribing is a theoretically laden process (GREEN, FRANQUIZ & DIXON, 1997; KVALE & BRINKMAN, 2009), few have engaged in reflexive analyses of the data history to demonstrate the consequences particular theoretical and methodological approaches pose in producing knowledge claims and inciting dialogues across traditions. The article demonstrates how theory-method-claim relationships in transcribing influence research transparency and warrantability. URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201146
DOI：
10.4337/9781849807296.00014
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Allan A
通讯作者：
Allan A