Decisions in the face of known risks: Ostracism increases risky decision-making
Decisions in the face of known risks: Ostracism increases risky decision-making
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jesp.2016.07.006
复制
发表时间：
2017-03-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Wirth, James H.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Buelow, Melissa T.;Wirth, James H.
排斥(被排斥和忽视)可能会对基本的、基本的需求以及更高层次的认知过程产生负面影响。决策是一种由无意识(类型I)和慎重(类型II)过程组成的认知过程。本研究对排斥对第一类和第二类风险决策的影响进行了多方面的评估。在两个研究中，我们使用不同的范式(即Cyberball和Atimia)操纵排斥，然后参与者完成风险决策的多个行为测量。结果表明，与包容相比，排斥增加了爱荷华州赌博任务和骰子游戏任务的风险决策，但不包括气球模拟风险任务。这些结果表明，排斥可能会影响高风险的决策过程。(C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。
Ostracism (being excluded and ignored) can have a negative effect on basic, fundamental needs as well as on higher-order cognitive processes. Decision-making is one such cognitive process that is composed of both unconscious (Type I) and deliberative (Type II) processes. The present studies utilized multiple assessments of the effect of ostracism on Type I and Type II risky decision-making. In two studies, we manipulated ostracism using different paradigms (i.e., Cyberball and Atimia) and then participants completed multiple behavioral measures of risky decision-making. Results indicated ostracism, compared to inclusion, increased risky decision-making on the Iowa Gambling Task and Game of Dice Task, but not the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. These results indicate ostracism likely affects risky decision-making processes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.