Severity of Hypoxemia and Other Factors That Influence the Response to Aerosolized Prostacyclin in ARDS

Severity of Hypoxemia and Other Factors That Influence the Response to Aerosolized Prostacyclin in ARDS
复制标题

DOI:
10.4187/respcare.05268
复制
发表时间:
2017-08-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Lipnick, Michael S.
Lipnick, Michael S.
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kallet, Richard H.;Burns, Gregory;Lipnick, Michael S.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:ARDS的特点是功能残气量(FRC)降低、异质性肺损伤和严重低氧血症。潮气式呼吸机优先分配给有呼吸机的肺泡。雾化前列腺素I-2通过诱导局部血管扩张来利用这一病理生理学机制,从而增加通风-灌流匹配,减少低氧血症。因此,雾化前列腺素I-2的疗效可能取决于FRC。P-AO2/F-IO2和呼吸系统顺应性(C-RS)都是FRC的间接标志,因此可能部分决定了对雾化前列腺素I-2的反应。方法:我们回顾了208例ARDS患者,他们接受前列腺素I-2雾化治疗,并在治疗开始前和治疗后进行了动脉血气监测,而没有进行其他呼吸机操作。受试者根据基线P-AO2/F-IO2(最低:60,中等:60-90,最高:90 mm Hg)和C-RS(<20,20-29,30-39,和>=40mL/cm H2O)以及其他因素(如脓毒症)进行分组。比较分析采用配对t检验,或Kruskal-Wallis和Dunn后验。采用多变量Logistic回归模型来确定18个临床相关因素中哪一个对雾化前列腺素I-2的反应最具预测性。阿尔法被设定为0.05。结果:前列腺素I-2治疗后,P-AO2/F-IO2平均升高33 mm Hg(42%),有效率为62%。各给氧组P-AO2/F-IO2均显著升高。最高基线P-AO2/F-IO2组的改善和有效率最大(51+/-63 mm Hg,82%)。此外,有脓毒症的患者的P-AO2/F-IO2较无脓毒症的患者改善较小(18+/-35vs40+/-55 mm Hg,P=0.002)。P-AO2/F-IO2和应答率均随C-RS改善而增加,但组间改善不一致。在最终的模型中,预测雾化前列腺素I-2的阳性反应的唯一因素是基线P-AO2/F-IO2(优势比1.1[1.004-1.205],P=0.042)和C-RS(优势比1.04[1.01-1.08],P=0.02)。结论:雾化前列腺素I-2改善了大约60%ARDS患者的氧合。良好的反应与基线P-AO2/F-IO2和C-RS密切相关。
BACKGROUND: ARDS is characterized by decreased functional residual capacity (FRC), heterogeneous lung injury, and severe hypoxemia. Tidal ventilation is preferentially distributed to ventilated alveoli. Aerosolized prostaglandin I-2 exploits this pathophysiology by inducing local vasodilation, thereby increasing ventilation-perfusion matching and reducing hypoxemia. Therefore, aerosolized prostaglandin I-2 efficacy may depend upon FRC. Both P-aO2/F-IO2 and compliance of the respiratory system (C-RS) are indirect signifiers of FRC and thus may partly determine the response to aerosolized prostaglandin I-2. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 208 ARDS subjects who received aerosolized prostaglandin I-2 and had arterial blood gases done before and after the initiation of therapy, without other ventilator manipulations. Subjects were grouped according to baseline P-aO2/F-IO2 (lowest: < 60, intermediate: 60-90, highest: > 90 mm Hg) and C-RS (< 20, 20-29, 30-39, and >= 40 mL/cm H2O) and by other factors, such as sepsis. Comparisons were analyzed by paired t tests, or Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post-tests. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was done to determine which of 18 clinically relevant factors were most predictive for responding to aerosolized prostaglandin I-2. alpha was set at .05. RESULTS: Mean P-aO2/F-IO2 increased by 33 mm Hg (42%) upon initiation of prostaglandin I-2, with a responder rate of 62%. P-aO2/F-IO2 increased significantly in all oxygenation groups. The highest baseline P-aO2/F-IO2 group had the greatest improvement and responder rate (51 +/- 63 mm Hg, and 82%). In addition, those with sepsis had a smaller improvement in P-aO2/F-IO2 compared with those without sepsis (18 +/- 35 vs 40 +/- 55 mm Hg, P = .002). Both P-aO2/F-IO2 and responder rate increased as C-RS improved, but between-group improvements were not as consistent. In the final model, the only factors that predicted a positive response to aerosolized prostaglandin I-2 were baseline P-aO2/F-IO2 (odds ratio 1.10 [1.004-1.205], P = .042) and C-RS (odds ratio 1.04 [1.01-1.08], P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Aerosolized prostaglandin I-2 improves oxygenation in approximately 60% of ARDS cases. A favorable response was most strongly associated with baseline P-aO2/F-IO2 and C-RS.