Response letter to Drs. Vidal, Villas Boas, Valle, and Fukushima.
Response letter to Drs. Vidal, Villas Boas, Valle, and Fukushima.
复制标题
给博士的回复信。
DOI：
10.1111/jgs.12336
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
6.3
通讯作者：
Mathuranath,PavagadaS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Verghese,Joe;Mathuranath,PavagadaS
我们感谢Vidal博士及其同事对基于图片的记忆障碍筛查（PMIS）的兴趣，并欢迎有机会提供更多细节。我们证实，参与者的名字的图片时，第一次显示，然后再次在响应类别线索时，看图片。这些识别和控制学习步骤类似于记忆障碍屏幕（MIS）。2与MIS不同，2日常生活活动量表3被用作额外的干扰任务，以将PMIS筛查扩展到教育程度低或不能倒数的文盲个体。其他文化和教育适当的认知测试可以探索作为干扰任务，以扩展考试的认知领域没有评估的PMIS。测试项目的性质，最佳cutscores和一些潜在的认知过程之间的PMIS和MIS不同。1因此，虽然PMIS是基于MIS，但这两种测试在研究背景下并不相同或可互换。PMIS的照片是
We thank Dr Vidal and colleagues for their interest in the Picture-based Memory Impairment Screen (PMIS), 1 and welcome the opportunity to provide additional details. We confirm that participants name the pictures when first shown and then again in response to the category cue when looking at the picture. These recognition and controlled learning steps are similar to the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS). 2 Unlike MIS, 2 an activity of daily living questionnaire3 was used as an additional interference task to expand PMIS screening to low education or illiterate individuals who could not count backwards. Other culture and education appropriate cognitive tests can be explored as the interference task to extend examination to cognitive domains not assessed by the PMIS. The nature of the test items, optimal cutscores and some of the underlying cognitive processes differ between PMIS and MIS. 1 Hence, while the PMIS is based on the MIS, these two tests are not identical or interchangeable in the context of research studies. The PMIS pictures were