China and Japan in Africa: Globalization and New Norms of Development Assistance and Cooperation
China and Japan in Africa: Globalization and New Norms of Development Assistance and Cooperation
复制标题
中日在非洲：全球化与发展援助合作新常态
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Chaldeans Mensah
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chaldeans Mensah
全球化改变了各国的命运，建立了新的政治和经济交流模式，与此同时，发展援助与合作的传统规范也面临挑战。全球化游戏中的两个亚洲经济赢家--日本和中国--我们正在为与非洲打交道提供新的途径，挑战传统的发展援助方式。这使两国能够为我们的理解做出贡献。非洲大陆面临的发展挑战，从过去的人道主义转向以伙伴关系、非洲自主权和互利为模式的发展合作。这一新的重点也使非洲领导人在确定自己的发展要求方面有了更多的投入，同时将中日竞争扩大到非洲发展合作领域。两国通过与非洲领导人讨论合作进程和内容的特别会议外交与非洲建立了政府间联系--日本的非洲发展东京国际会议（TICAD），本文对中国和日本在非洲的发展援助与合作方式进行了比较分析，评估了它们与非洲大陆的系统性接触如何挑战了发展援助的旧模式，并强调了非洲大陆从全球化边缘缓慢崛起的过程。关键词：走向全球化，中国的非洲政策，后被动国家，经合组织/发援会，南南合作，日本的非洲政策，东京会议，中非合作论坛，规范。简历：随着全球化进程的发展，我们将看到两个国家的命运如何，我们将建立新的政治和经济领域的合作伙伴关系，以便从传统的援助和合作的角度促进发展。日本和中国都不希望亚洲加入全球化进程，因此必须重新采取与非洲的关系方式，废除传统，协助发展。我们希望通过我们的努力，为非洲大陆的发展作出贡献，使我们能够利用反毒气和人道主义的手段，为实现非洲地区的和平与发展作出贡献，并使我们能够相互尊重。这是一个新的焦点，它强调对非洲发展的贡献迈斯，但没有明确自己对发展的兴趣，因为没有进程，日本和中国之间没有竞争力，也没有能力发展非洲的合作。在非洲各国建立政府间联盟的国家，特别是在非洲各国讨论合作进程和开展合作的会议上，设立了大使馆。非洲发展问题东京国际会议（TICAD）和中国，中非合作论坛（FOCAC）。考虑到政治和前景，中国人和日本人在“走向全球化”方面正在制定一项旨在促进非洲发展的行动计划和合作计划。核查的具体办法是对支持非洲发展的系统进行投资，并与发展中国家的传统做法进行比较。我们所要做的是确定合作的现有规范，而不是制定有意义的做法。我们的结论是，非洲的市场还没有足够的信息来确定非洲目前正在发展一种合作关系，这种合作关系是一种规范的合作实践，而不是一种大陆性的合作。Palavras-chave：Go Globalism，Politica Chinesa帕拉Africa，Estado pos-reativo，OECD/DAC，Cooperacao Sul-Sul，Politica japonesa帕拉Africa，TICAD，FOCAC，normas. DOI：10.20424/2237-7743/bjir.v4n2p157-197
Globalization has shifted the fortunes of states and established new patterns of political and economic interchange, with attendant challenges to traditional norms of development assistance and cooperation. Two Asian economic winners in the globalization game – Japan and China – are contributing novel paths of dealing with Africa that challenge traditional approaches to development assistance. This is positioning both states to contribute to our understanding of ways to address the development challenges of the continent that shifts from past preoccupations with humanitarianism to development cooperation that is modeled on partnership, African ownership and mutual benefit. This new focus also accords greater input to African leaders in determining their own development requirements, while extending Sino-Japanese rivalry to the African development cooperation space. Both countries have established inter-governmental linkages with Africa through special conference diplomacy with African leaders to discuss the process and content of cooperation – Japan’s Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD), and China’s Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC). This paper offers a comparative analysis of China and Japan’s approaches to development assistance and cooperation in Africa, and assesses how their systematic engagement with the continent is challenging the old patterns of development assistance, and highlighting the continent’s slow rise from the margins of globalization. Keywords: Go Globalism, China’s Africa policy, Post Reactive State, OECD/DAC, South-South Cooperation, Japan’s Africa Policy, TICAD, FOCAC, Norms. Resumo: Com o processo de globalizacao, vimos uma mudanca nas fortunas dos estados e o estabelecimento de novos padroes de intercâmbio nos campos politicos e economicos, que sao acompanhados por desafios as perspectivas tradicionais sobre assistencia e cooperacao para o desenvolvimento. O Japao e a China, dois ganhadores asiaticos no jogo da globalizacao, estao apontando novos caminhos nas maneiras de se relacionar com a Africa que desafiam as abordagens tradicionais a assistencia para o desenvolvimento. Isso posiciona ambos Estados para contribuirem com o entendimento de opcoes para enfrentar os desafios de desenvolvimento do continente que se desloca das antigas preocupacoes com o humanitarismo para o desenvolvimento cooperativo moldado pelo conceito de parceria, propriedade africana, e beneficios mutuos. Esse novo foco pretende oferecer uma abertura para uma contribuicao mais ampla da lideranca africana na definicao dos proprios interesses para o desenvolvimento, quanto no processo, estendendo-se a rivalidade entre os japoneses e os chineses no espaco do desenvolvimento cooperativo na Africa. Ambos os paises tem estabelecidos ligacoes intergovernamentais com os paises africanos por meio da diplomacia nos congressos especiais com os lideres africanos para discutir o processo e conteudo da cooperacao. No Japao, o Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD) e na China, o Forum on China-African Cooperation (FOCAC). Consideramos as politicas e os perspectivos desses dois paises – os chineses de “Go Globalism” e os japoneses do estado pos-reativo – sobre a maneira de ajudar e colaborar com o desenvolvimento na Africa. Tratamos especificamente de verificar se esses investimentos sistematizados apoiam a autonomia africana em comparacao aos padroes antigos do desenvolvimento. A questao chave e se os dois atores se desviam das normas existentes da cooperacao no desenvolvimento de maneira significativa. Concluimos que ate agora nao ha informacao suficiente para determinar que a presenca desses dois estados na Africa deve ser tratada como uma mudanca paradigmatica das praticas normativas na cooperacao no desenvolvimento desse continente. Palavras-chave: Go Globalism, Politica chinesa para Africa, Estado pos-reativo, OECD/DAC, Cooperacao Sul-Sul, Politica japonesa para Africa, TICAD, FOCAC, normas. DOI: 10.20424/2237-7743/bjir.v4n2p157-197
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Dent, Christopher M.
通讯作者：
Dent, Christopher M.