Assessing explanatory style: the content analysis of verbatim explanations and the Attributional Style Questionnaire.
Assessing explanatory style: the content analysis of verbatim explanations and the Attributional Style Questionnaire.
复制标题
评估解释风格：逐字解释的内容分析和归因风格问卷。
DOI：
10.1016/0005-7967(89)90084-3
复制
发表时间：
1989
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Seligman,ME
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Schulman,P;Castellon,C;Seligman,ME
我们比较了两种评价解释风格的方法——逐字解释内容分析（CAVE）和归因风格问卷（ASQ）。CAVE技术是一种允许研究人员分析任何自然发生的逐字材料的解释风格的方法。这项技术允许测量不愿意或不能参加ASQ的各种人群。本研究对169名大学生进行了ASQ和贝克抑郁量表（BDI）的问卷调查，并采用CAVE技术对ASQ的书面原因进行了内容分析。CAVE技术与ASQ的相关性为0.71 (P< 0.0001,n= 159)，与BDI的相关性为- 0.36 （P< 0.0001,n= 159）。ASQ与BDI相关性为- 0.51 （P< 0.0001,n= 160）。CAVE技术和ASQ似乎都是评估解释风格的有效工具。
We compare two methods of assessing explanatory style—the content analysis of verbatim explanations (CAVE) and the Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ). The CAVE technique is a method that allows the researcher to analyze any naturally occurring verbatim materials for explanatory style. This technique permits the measurement of various populations that are unwilling or unable to take the ASQ. We administered the ASQ and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) to 169 undergraduates and content analyzed the written causes on the ASQ for explanatory style by the CAVE technique. The CAVE technique correlated 0.71 with the ASQ (P< 0.0001,n= 159) and −0.36 with BDI (P< 0.0001,n= 159). The ASQ correlated −0.51 with the BDI (P< 0.0001,n= 160). Both the CAVE technique and the ASQ seem to be valid devices for assessing explanatory style.