Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in a laboratory situation
Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in a laboratory situation
复制标题
对实验室环境中遭受不公正待遇的敏感性和对不公平待遇的反应
DOI：
10.1007/bf02683307
复制
发表时间：
1997
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Manfred J. Schmitt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Mohiyeddini;Manfred J. Schmitt
在第一阶段，171名学生接受了问卷调查，以测量对遭遇不公正的敏感性（SBI）、特质愤怒、愤怒、愤怒控制、自我主张和对分配正义原则（机会平等、公平）的态度。两个月后（时间2），其中75名受试者在实验室的竞争和成就行为的情况下受到不公平对待。违反了两项正义原则：机会均等原则和公平原则。四周后（时间3），32名受试者回顾性评价了不公平待遇。这三种情况都是作为独立的研究提出的，受试者认为它们之间没有联系。根据我们的假设，我们发现，即时和延迟的反应，不公正的待遇取决于SBI在相当大的程度上。例如，SBI调查问卷的综合得分预测，β权重为0.71，使用各种客观信息来源的三位专家的综合评分（例如，受试者和实验者之间的录音互动），以估计受试者对不公平待遇表现出的情感、言语和行为怨恨的程度。与此同时，其他结构的度量（例如，自信心、特质愤怒、愤怒表达），这也可以在理论上与标准相联系，解释不公正待遇反应的差异，或者解释比例小得多。
At Time 1, 171 students were administered questionnaires for measuring sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI), trait anger, anger in, anger out, anger control, self-assertiveness, and attitudes toward principles of distributive justice (equality of chances, equity). Two months later (Time 2), 75 of these subjects were treated unfairly in a laboratory situation dealing with competition and achievement behavior. Two justice principles were violated: the equality of chances principle and the equity principle. Four weeks later (Time 3), 32 subjects evaluated the unfair treatment in retrospect. All three occasions were presented as independent studies with the subjects perceiving no connection between them. In line with our hypotheses, we found that immediate and delayed reactions to the unjust treatments depended to a considerable degree on SBI. For example, the combined score of the SBI questionnaire predicted, with a beta weight of .71, a combined rating of three experts who used various sources of objective information (e.g., tape-recorded interactions between subject and experimenter) to estimate the degree to which the subject displayed emotional, verbal, and behavioral resentment against the unfair treatment. At the same time, measures for other constructs (e.g., assertiveness, trait anger, anger expression), which can also be linked theoretically to the criteria, explained either none or a much smaller proportion of variance in reactions to unjust treatment.