Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?

Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.956
复制
发表时间:
2002-06-01
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
Hannon, PA
Hannon, PA
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Finkel, EJ;Rusbult, CE;Hannon, PA

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这项工作补充了现有的研究有关宽恕的过程中强调的承诺在激励宽恕的作用。基于相互依存理论的分析,作者认为:(a)受害者对背叛的自我导向反应与宽恕是对立的。倾向于怨恨和复仇之类的冲动。以及(B)宽恕取决于亲关系动机,其中一个原因是强烈的承诺。一个启动实验,横断面调查研究,互动记录的研究揭示了协会(或因果关系的影响)的承诺与宽恕的证据。承诺-宽恕的关联似乎依赖于坚持的意图,而不是长期的取向或心理依恋。另外。承诺宽恕协会调解的认知解释的背叛事件:调解的情绪反应的证据是不一致的。
This work complements existing research regarding the forgiveness process by highlighting the role of commitment in motivating forgiveness. On the basis of an interdependence-theoretic analysis, the authors suggest that (a) victims' self-oriented reactions to betrayal are antithetical to forgiveness. favoring impulses such as grudge and vengeance. and (b) forgiveness rests on prorelationship motivation, one cause of which is strong commitment. A priming experiment, a cross-sectional survey study, and an interaction record study revealed evidence of associations (or causal effects) of commitment with forgiveness. The commitment-forgiveness association appearred to rest on intent to persist rather than long-term orientation or psychological attachment. In addition. the commitment-forgiveness association was mediated by cognitive interpretations of betrayal incidents: evidence for mediation by emotional reactions was inconsistent.