Civil–military synergies in EU crisis response and peacebuilding: a framework for analysis
Civil–military synergies in EU crisis response and peacebuilding: a framework for analysis
复制标题
欧盟危机应对和和平建设中的军民协同：分析框架
DOI：
10.1080/23340460.2018.1532769
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Peter Horne Zartsdahl
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Peter Horne Zartsdahl
为了应对新的战争，国际组织在增加民事和军事手段之间的协同作用方面面临着挑战。本文分析了军民协同作为协调的逻辑框架的结果，并询问在何种程度上的欧盟对外行动的军民协调活动，导致协同作用在地面上。它提供了一个概念框架，以应对三个不同的概念挑战：（1）提供一种接口类型，以阐明军民研究范围，（2）界定“军民”，（3）界定军民协同作用维斯协调。该框架适用于欧盟的参与下的共同安全与防务政策（CSDP）的案例研究，重点是欧盟的业务层面在执行阶段。它发现，欧盟的孤立的指挥结构阻碍了文书之间的协调，在一定程度上，军民协同作用更常见于外部合作伙伴之间，而不是CSDP文书之间，并与“相关行为者”协调的开放任务容易受到个人解释。
ABSTRACT Responding to New Wars, international organizations have faced challenges in increasing synergies between civilian and military instruments. This paper analyses civil-military synergies as a logical framework outcome of coordination and asks to what degree activities of civil-military coordination in EU external action has led to synergies on the ground. It provides a conceptual framework tackling three distinct conceptual challenges; (1) providing a typology of interfaces to articulate civil-military research scope(s), (2) delimiting the “civil-military”, and (3) defining civil-military synergy vis-á-vis coordination. The framework is applied in a case study of EU engagements under the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) focusing on EU’s operational level during the execution phase. It finds that EU’s siloed command structure hampers coordination between instruments to a degree where civil-military synergies are more common with external partners than between CSDP instruments, and that open mandates to coordinate with “relevant actors” are vulnerable to personal interpretations.