Behind the Mask of the Secular
Behind the Mask of the Secular
复制标题
世俗面具的背后
DOI：
10.1163/22118349-00502005
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
0.3
通讯作者：
Masayoshi Sumika
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
WADA;Hajime;亀井大輔;高橋悟;氣多雅子;信原幸弘;Mitsuya Mori;Mark R. Mullins;Masayoshi Sumika
尤尔根·哈贝马斯（Jürgen Habermas）推广了“后世俗”的概念，他主张所有公民都应该自由决定他们是否想在公共领域使用宗教语言。然而，他补充说，这样做的公民必须接受宗教言论应该被翻译成普遍可用的语言。哈贝马斯提出了“翻译”的概念，或者说制度翻译的附带条件，作为将宗教公民带入公共领域的一种方式。他认为，公共领域和/或公共机构不应向任何试图以宗教理由使国家合法化的运动开放。本文认为，在战后日本的宗教法庭辩论中，我们可以找到与哈贝马斯的但书相对应的逻辑和修辞。本文通过对这些争议的梳理，探讨了机构翻译但书的目的是否达到。
Jürgen Habermas, who popularized the concept of the “post-secular,” advocates that all citizens should be free to decide whether they want to use religious language in the public sphere. However, he adds the proviso that citizens who do so must accept that religious utterances ought to be translated into generally accessible language. Habermas presents this concept of “translation”—or the institutional translation proviso—as a way of bringing religious citizens into the public sphere. In his opinion, the public sphere and/or public institutions should not be open to any movement that tries to legitimize the nation on religious grounds. This paper shows that we can find logic and rhetoric that correspond to Habermas’s proviso in courtroom arguments over religion in Japan after World WarII. By surveying these disputes, this paper examines whether or not the intended aims of the institutional translation proviso are achieved.