'How do we know it's not been done yet?!' Trust, trust building and regulation in stem cell research
'How do we know it's not been done yet?!' Trust, trust building and regulation in stem cell research
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/spp/37.9.703
复制
发表时间：
2010-11-01
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Cunningham-Burley, Sarah
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bates, Stephen R.;Faulkner, Wendy;Cunningham-Burley, Sarah
公众对干细胞研究（SCR）可能在某种程度上不受约束地进行感到不安，这引发了对科学/科学家的信任和监管之间联系的问题，与（重新）建立公众对科学信任的政策驱动具有更广泛的相关性。本文分析了三个主题：不同的对象的信任在科学（个人，机构和更广泛的背景下）;这些对象之间的信任和监管在信任建设的潜在作用的联系;和信任建设作为一个表演的做法。本文借鉴经验，在英国公众参与活动的SCR的信任和监管的审议。我们的研究结果表明，科学家和更广泛的公众之间的对话接触可以产生相当大的开放性和复杂性，参与者能够审议“信任”的多方面性质，并努力解决复杂和具有挑战性的问题。我们反思的情况下，监管可能会提高公众对科学的信任，公众参与的信任建设的可能作用，并呼吁科学家更大的制度反思。
Public unease that stem cell research (SCR) may be proceeding somewhat unfettered raises issues about links between trust in and regulation of science/scientists, with wider relevance to a policy drive to (re)build public trust in science. This paper analyses three themes: different objects of trust in science (individuals, institutions and wider context); links between these objects of trust and potential roles for regulation in trust building; and trust building as a performative practice. The paper draws empirically on deliberations on trust and regulation in SCR at a UK public engagement event. Our findings demonstrate that dialogic encounters between scientists and wider publics can generate considerable openness and sophistication, with participants capable of deliberating on the multifaceted nature of 'trust' and grappling with complex and challenging issues. We reflect on the circumstances in which regulation might enhance public trust in science, on the possible role of public engagement in trust building, and on calls for greater institutional reflexivity by scientists.